There’s a video floating around lately which is overwhelmingly accurate and factually corroborated. It essentially repackages information which is well-known in HBD and Manosphere circles into a polished and well-produced presentation. The thesis is simple: women’s biological drives are contrary to the best interests of civilization and that the past century or so of women’s enfranchisement and liberation has been detrimental to societal stability. Continue reading
Mad Max: Fury Road is out in theatres now. It’s the feminist action movie that women have been waiting for, and the cishet white male society gets crushed by women in glorious 1.85:1 cinema screen ratio (even worse if you watch in 3D!). And it’s the truth! But, it’s only the truth if you don’t read the fine print. The real truth of the matter is that Fury Road is not the feminist action flic that it’s been made out to be.
This is the long awaited installment to George MIller’s Mad Max franchise. This movie does have some explicit feminist messages, but don’t let that stop you from watching the film. Really. If you enjoyed the Alien franchise with Sigourney Weaver then you would probably enjoy this one. I’m truly sorry to be the one to tell you this if you haven’t figured it out yet, but the entire Alien franchise was a feminist production about female agency and power.
Don’t listen to Return of Kings. This is a good movie. This movie is, more than anything else I’ve seen yet, not a rejection of men but an affirmation of the necessity of men and the historical failure of matriarchal societies.
>> Women; Can’t Live With Them [Anglin]
> Where the White Women At [Parrott]
I generally resist the urge to get the last word in on back-n-forth arguments. Once both sides have clearly laid out their positions, there’s a point of diminishing returns with repeated exchanges which serve only to dwell on more details and inspire more enmity. That being said, Anglin and several others claimed that my original post was unclear, confusing, and even self-contradictory. I’ll attempt to explain my position on the Woman Question a bit more clearly this time around, contrasting it with Anglin’s.
Anglin accuses me of feminism, a charge which I firmly reject. I believe that men should be raised and expected to leaders and women should be raised and expected to submit to masculine leadership and authority. I believe the husband should be the unchallenged head of his household and family. I believe that God, through his design of the natural world, designed the sexes for a steward/servant dynamic which is intrinsically encoded in our respective natures and extrinsically required to thrive and succeed in His world.
That’s certainly not feminist.
I accused Anglin of “misogyny” and “dishonor” in my original piece, advisedly, as he has contended without retraction that our women are at least as destructive as Organized Jewry. I’m not in the habit of calling those who disagree with me on theory “dishonorable,” least of all Anglin, but to insist that our mothers, wives, and daughters are, as a class, worse than Jews sort of requires it. While the term “misogyny” is overused in today’s society, and it’s typically associated with feminism, feminists, and degenerates, the irrational hatred of women is a thing, and to compare our women to Organized Jewry is that thing. Continue reading
The Slut Walk 2015 season is here. This means scantily clad women parading in the streets chanting “yes means yes!” and all the while pretending to be victims of supposed rape culture. It’s the same old song and dance (even though they do it anew every year) of “muh sexual freedoms” and reductio ad Patriarchy.
On January 24, 2011, Toronto Police Constable Michael Sanguinetti said, ” …Women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized.”
Sanguinetti’s abrasive advice is what started Slut Walk, and for the record I’m glad that we have men and women speaking out against rape culture in response to him. I’ve heard worse advice on how to prevent rape, but it’s important to recognize that rape culture didn’t just spring up out of nowhere. Continue reading
Andrew Anglin’s Daily Stormer has become the most active and popular pro-white website, much to the chagrin of the “respectable” paleocon leadership of America’s White Nationalist movement. This development is in part because Anglin’s a talented and prolific polemicist, but it’s also because his political theory is superior to his colleagues’. While they’re wasting time and energy in futile attempts to win the respect of an establishment which despises them and eternally belabor the point that we’re factually correct on our key considerations, Anglin’s speaking directly to alienated and frustrated young white men who don’t care to look “normal,” wouldn’t want this system’s “respectability,” and take delight in triggering each and every taboo that the old guard so studiously works to tip-toe around.
There’s utility in projects like VDare, NPI, and AmRen, and I support all those projects, but they’re actually less relevant and politically impactful than sites like Daily Stormer, precisely because they speak to comfortable and respectable bourgeois whites. Comfortable and respectable folks who will anxiously scurry off at the first sign of aggressive or confrontational language aren’t where revolutions foment. The popular idea that we should focus on influence and entryism instead of developing radical dissident subcultures, given the tactical situation of White identity in North America, is almost certainly the worst and most stupid idea to ever plague this movement notorious for its bad ideas.
We need more angry young men, not more ‘race realist’ pensioners.