The Werewolf of the North: The Mystery of Ancient Mathematics

The Second Consciousness

The art of counting finite things precedes civilization itself. It is simply inconceivable that primitive hunter-gathers had no sense of number. Even the higher animals, the warm-blooded predators, arguably have some kind of rudimentary sense of number.

The mortal mind cannot conceive of numbers as purely abstract units, but only as particular numerals, words, or things counted. Therefore numbers do not exist in the mind. But the mind’s discriminatory faculty is the only thing that makes one number different from any other number in its place. Therefore numbers do not exist outside the mind, either. But if numbers do not exist in the mind, nor outside the mind, from whence do they come into being? Numbers exist only insofar as they are feared. They are material things, at least as understood from this planet, and all matter is fear. Continue reading


The White Terror International: Weimar Germany and the Russian Civil War

After the Russian Civil War had broken out, a pro-German wing of the Russian White movement appeared in contrast to the pro-Entente sentiment of the mainstream Russian Whites. It must have been difficult for these Russian nationalists to forgive General Ludendorff and the Germans for aiding the Bolshevik Revolution and overseeing the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. Yet, in these outspoken Russians’ eyes, Ludendorff and the Germans had only been doing their jobs compared to the Western liberal powers, with their pro-Bolshevik banks and their corrupt negligence of their Russian ally’s logistical needs.

Continue reading


Folk Rights and Political Rights

There are two kinds of rights: Political rights and folk rights.  Political rights are relative; they rise, fall, rise again, and fall again like waves.  Folk rights are cold, hard, and undying.  Only folk rights are God-given, and therefore defended.  Political rights are won or lost in the fight of the state of nature, and therefore granted.

History furnishes examples of the distinction between folk rights and political rights.  The Romans, having conquered a nation, either annihilated it or, having decided that option unnecessary, entirely respected its folk rights.  Romanian historian Nicolae Iorga exaggerated the extent to which the Ottoman Empire was “Roman” in this sense, but it is true that the Turks were not usually very interested in mutilating the subjugated Balkan cultures.  One can observe this in the way Bulgaria is still Bulgaria, far more than the once-mighty Western nations are what they essentially are.  The difference between folk rights and political rights can even be seen in more modern epochs.  Louisiana was the most humane and enlightened state in the historical development of the American Union, because it was the only one to respect all national life — even that of the slaves.

Continue reading


White Turan Against Gay Atlantis: Polarity, Plurality, and Ancient Sexuality

The following article was originally published pseudonymously, in large part because this writer was not yet satisfied with its scholarship. The problem was not that the original theses were wrong, but that they were vague and lacked notations. Here, some corrections have been made, and the brief article’s length is more than doubled by citations and notes.

The Real Turan: Confusions and Clarifications 

An abundance of archeological evidence shows us that the ancient Indo-Europeans, or Aryans in older writings, originated on the Pontic Steppe, which stretches from eastern Romania to Central Asia, but especially in present-day Ukraine and southwestern Russia.  They were the first in human history to domesticate the horse.[i]  They vastly expanded from Western Europe to Western China, though their direct and permanent influence in the east may have more or less stopped at India.  (The extent of their influence on China remains a bit of a mystery.)[ii] Continue reading


What Is “Gender Politics” and Who Are “Women Everywhere?”

In truth, there is no such thing as sexual politics. Even the New York Times has recently been forced to confess this. The iron law of the friend-enemy distinction precludes any such thing as sex politics or “gender politics,” for the simple reason that it is impossible to kill all the men on earth or all the women on earth. To even picture such a thing is nothing but a sick masturbatory fantasy, which is in fact what any “gender politics” really is.

Continue reading