The Orthodox Nationalist: Tsar Nicholas – The Loss of a Great Man


On July 17, 1918 the royal family of Russia were murdered and today’s podcast was recorded on the 98th anniversary of the crime.

Tsar Nicholas is one of the greatest men of the 20th century. His reign was a success on all fronts. Industrial growth was extraordinary. Railroads were being laid throughout that huge country. Iron and steel production increased by about 156% between 1900-1913, while pig iron, or unprocessed iron, increased by almost 100%.

The state was spending a fortune on education at all levels. Peasants were buying land from the nobility through the peasant land bank, which offered credit on very good terms. Other peasants were moving to fertile parts of Siberia, at government expense, with state supplied tools and seed. Russian exports and her foreign trade increased by about 150% throughout Nicholas’ reign. Between 1861 and 1916, about 90% of the land was in peasant hands. In Germany at the time, the figure was about 40%.

The fact is that the old nobility were disappearing. While few of these nobles were wealthy, almost all of them were deep in debt. Government service, a rising peasant class and a middle class were slowly taking over. The working class by 1900 was still tiny. Contrary to popular belief, peasant landholding was expanding in every direction, both in it’s communal setting as well as for individual proprietors. Russian taxes were the lowest in Europe, at 1.83 rubles per capita, versus the equivalent of 17 rubles in Great Britain at the time.

Russia was becoming urbanized. Like the rest of Europe, she had periods of labor unrest, but probably had the best pro-labor legislation in the world, passed by Alexander III, his father. It was tough to fire workers. Hours were reduced and night hours were forbidden for children and women. The factory inspectorate was created, which sent government inspectors to look at working conditions and hear labor complaints. Wages were continually rising. Sergei Witte, Nicholas’ prime minister, made it easier for peasants to buy land on their own. Even Soviet estimates of peasant landownership under Nicholas show that about 90.45% of the land was owned by the peasantry as the nobility was desperate to sell.

From 1898 to 1913, the Russian farmer increased his live animal herds by over 200%, butter by over 300% and both fresh and salted meats by almost 500%. Russia grew about 60% of the world’s rye and about 30 percent of it’s oats. This is partly due to the increasing number of peasant proprietors, as well as the investment of the Russian government at all levels in improvement of peasant agricultural methods.

Russia was running both a trade and budget surplus. This was partly due to her newer industries such as oil, steel and sugar beets, but her massive increases in grain production also played a part. Her only substantial debts were to France.

Almost all government positions were elected. The commune was the main organ for the peasants, it had its own courts and police. All were elected. The next level up was the volost court (like a county court), which was also elected. The zemstva were units of local government that were elected too, with a noble dominated upper house and a peasant lower house. Communes would send delegates to get their views heard.

Governorships were still appointed from St. Petersburg, but could do little without the consent of local governing bodies. The Tsar was not absolute. The nobility was given it’s charter of liberties under Peter III, Catherine II and Paul, and had substantial civil rights, despite their desperate economic position. Peasants had a right to land in the communal system and were judged solely according to their own law. Enforcement was difficult, since Petersburg was so far away, so most government was local. Contrary to public belief the Russian bureaucracy was far smaller per capital than England or France.

The church was experiencing a revival. With the writings of the Slavophiles, the rise of hesychasm (a form of monastic prayer) in Optina and Sarov, the immense popularity of St. John of Kronstadt, and before him, Filaret of Moscow, the Orthodox Church was growing rapidly. A new group of intellectual theologians were coming on the scene by 1900.

Tsar Nicholas II was murdered by a British empire that saw Russia as its primary threat. He was murdered by a “Russian” press that invested story after story to incite the people against him. These stories were then reported in English papers without criticism.

The Kahal in Brooklyn decreed the death penalty for Tsar Nicholas. Below is a postcard that they issued. The left panel shows the sacrificial chicken with Tsar Nicholas’ head on it. The right panel is a French issued card from the Jewish Kahal in Paris that says “Holy Russia.” The tsar’s head is on a pike.


Source: Radio Aryan


Direct Download
  • Pingback: The Orthodox Nationalist: Tsar Nicholas – The Loss of a Great Man | Aus-Alt-Right()

  • SimplyFred

    How did Tsar Nicholas anger the jews? He nationalized the liquor industry. In doing so he disenfranchised jew liquor magnates. All the jews had left was prostitution, pornography, and drugs.

    • Lybeck

      The jewish-russian elite was also among the rich money lenders, rentlords, landowners etc. The abolishment of serfdom meant that the Russian working class became richer & more independent, at the (relative) expense of some “oligarchs”. Read “200 years together” for details.

  • One area in which Alt Right is ahead of everyone, even Trump, is that it accurately, honestly, courageously, and correctly identifies Jewish Power as the MAIN FORCE behind the dehumanization and dispossession of white people.

    This is where even Trump fails. All this “We must hate on Muslims to protect Jews and homos” totally misses the point.

    Unless we aim for the main enemy target, the white race cannot make real change and save itself.

    Imagine in a war where all your firepower are aimed at everything BUT the main hilltop with the biggest cannons.

    It doesn’t matter how much firepower you have if your aim is off and not hitting the area that is shooting volleys at you.

    Suppose your enemy has a pistol with one bullet while you have a machine gun with a 1000 rounds. Suppose he aims the pistol at your head while you aim your gun at everything but him. You can shoot all you want, but it won’t make any difference. In contrast, he need to pull the trigger only once to kill you.

    It’s like in boxing. The boxer beats the brawler because the boxer knows the sweet science of hitting the opponent right on the button. Brawler just flails, missing most of the punches while tiring.

    It’s the politics of aim. If you don’t have the aim, you can’t win the game.

    Jews aim for white power. In contrast, whites have been aiming at everything but Jewish power that has been most instrumental in the destruction of the white race. All those conservatives who worry about Sharia in America, Russia(in ‘new cold war’), or Iran… what a bunch of dummies. Maybe they think they can appease Jews by hating on nations and peoples that Jews hate, but Jews are insatiable and never reciprocate in kind.

    Alt Right is in the vanguard because it identifies the proper target. Jewish Power. Alt Right doesn’t hate Jews as a people. But it knows that Jewish Power is out to destroy the white race. Too many powerful Jews are like George Soros.

    ——————

  • Hayekian

    I’d love to see the sources for the hard data presented. Please, someone?

tsar-nicholas

By: Fr. Matthew Raphael Johnson


Matthew Raphael Johnson is a scholar of Russian Orthodox history and philosophy. His research interests focus on Russian political theory and religious ideas, concentrating on the central role of nationalism, Eurasianism and the Orthodox tradition as forms of rebellion against globalism and liberalism. His Orthodox Nationalist podcast series is available here.

%d bloggers like this: