Learning from Europe: How Our Nationalist Movement Can Enter the 21st Century


I just returned home from spending two weeks in Europe with comrades from Golden Dawn in Greece and the Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (NPD) in Germany. Having the opportunity to stand with comrades in Europe at local meetings, rallies, and even a national Party congress has helped me better understand the European nationalist movement and how we can improve the movement here in America.

In order to be successful, we must understand that the American nationalist movement must evolve in terms of rhetoric, style, presentation, and more. It is time to model ourselves after our European brothers and sisters, adapting their successful strategies to our American context.

I had countless conversations with Party members of both the NPD and Golden Dawn ranging from young enthusiastic comrades to those who have been in the struggle for decades. Each person was able to give me a unique perspective on ways that our movement in America can tactically and optically adapt and improve to succeed in the contemporary political reality.

I have come to some conclusions which will not be popular with the “Old School Movement” but are necessary for our movement to finally begin to move forward after decades of treading water relative to our colleagues abroad. There are differences between our struggle and theirs which must be accounted for. But for the most part, it’s a straightforward matter of learning how to do a better job from people who are doing a better job.

The infighting and failures of most American White nationalist groups makes our movement look like this

The infighting and failures of most American White nationalist groups makes our movement look like this

The comrades in the Czech Worker’s Party who I had the pleasure of marching with last year in Brno are a small Party by Czech standards and yet in a nation with a population smaller than the New York City Metropolitan Area was able to mobilize more Party members on the street than I have ever seen at a protest or rally here in America.

So the question is, “What Changes Need to Be Made?” Something people have debated for decades in our movement and now, after being able to spend two trips to Europe with comrades from multiple countries, I think I have a few ideas.

Things That Must Go

  1. Supremacism in any form
  2. Petty Factionalism
  3. Support of Capitalism
  4. Violent Rhetoric
  5. Acting fringe

Thing That Must Go #1: Supremacism in any form

The White Nationalist movement in America for decades hasn’t actually been a nationalist movement, it has been a hateful and supremacist movement. I personally disagree with this attitude and it actively alienates normal White Americans from our positions. There’s been a move to reframe the supremacism in dry academic language, and some disingenuous posturing against supremacism, but a neo-colonialist fixation on “greater” and “lesser” people remains.

A nationalist movement historically and today is based on love of ones culture, Identity, traditions, and ethnic extended family, not hatred of other groups simply because they are different. Frustration and resentment is natural, and there’s a thin line between love towards one’s own and prideful chauvinism. We must strive to avoid crossing that line.

Corneliu Codreanu, the founder of the Legion of Saint Michael the Archangel in Romania discussed how the Legion and thus all Romanian nationalism was based on a love of our ancestors, maintaining their traditions and building a moral and healthy future for our children.

When we speak of the Romanian nation, we refer not only to the Romanians currently living on the same territory, with the same past and same future, the same habits, the same language, the same interests. When we speak of the Romanian nation we refer to all Romanians, dead or alive, who have lived on this land of ours from the beginnings of history and will live on it also in the future.”

This is the definition of a nation and thus a nationalist works to protect and fight for these noble concepts of Faith, family and folk. Never does nationalism fall into hatred. It is a worldview based exclusively on love, honor, and sacrifice.

White Supremacy is the racist grandpa of neo-colonialism, and it’s a distraction and detractor from the post-colonial yet pro-white dialectic we must arrive at. It desires for Whites to rule over and dominate other ethnic groups. This comes from many sides, but the ideological basis of using language that dehumanizes communities based on their ethnicity need to go.

Nationalists are not supremacists and in my mind, supremacists are not true nationalists. Positions found in literature like The Turner Diaries and other old movement rhetoric about dominating the world and destroying indigenous populations for the sake of White supremacy belong in the trash, not on your reading list. Fight for your people and your Patria, that is all.

Ideologies that dehumanize non-Europeans as “mud people,” “beasts of the field,” and such were wrong when they were concocted and they are wrong now. The struggle of Arabs to free themselves from Zionism or the battle of Latin American nations to battle against international finance controlling their economies are battles in the same war that Europeans are fighting. It’s difficult for many raised and steeped in the old colonial and neo-colonial mindsets to wrap their minds around, but our nationalist project is necessarily anti-colonial, against what the West has become.

An example can be found on the issue of Hispanic immigration into America. Hispanics are immigrating by the tens of millions into America primarily because of Western-backed destabilization of their nations’ economic and foreign policies during the Cold War and current Free Trade Agreements like NAFTA. They’ve destroyed the agricultural base for tens of millions of Mexicans and Latin Americans. The reason they are flooding north is because globalism and capitalism have destroyed their homelands and many of the leaders of these nations are in the pockets of international business and the banking elites, leaving many without options.

When political and economic stability return to areas, many immigrants self-deport to their nation of origin. If we fix the problem of global capitalism, the immigration crisis wouldn’t he happening. Hispanics shouldn’t hate Whites just as Whites shouldn’t hate Hispanics. It’s globalism causing the demographic and economic issues we are all facing. For too long the White Nationalist movement has been angry at the symptoms, not the root cause of our current plight.

The immigrants must go, but not because they’re somehow “bad” or “inferior.” They just don’t belong here.

All nationalists, regardless of ethnicity, should stand united against our common foes, the rootless international clique of globalists and bankers that wish to dominate all free peoples on the Earth. We man the same barricades against the same enemies, to attack other nationalists of different racial backgrounds is like shooting into the foxhole next to you instead of at the enemy who is charging your lines. It is all hands on deck for all free peoples of the world, it is time to start acting like it.

Thing That Must Go #2: Petty Factionalism

A social or political movement is like an army, you need to have commanders who direct the forces to make wise decisions on the field of battle. If every private in the trenches was able to form his own army and do whatever he wanted, a war effort would come grinding to a halt. A political movement needs to have a command structure that is formed around maintaining messaging, ideology, use of resources and organization.

For decades the White Nationalist movement has had more chiefs than we have indians in many respects. This factionalization is not new to either nationalists or the far Left. On the Left, you have Stalinists fighting with Trotskyists, who battle it out with anarchists of every different variety. Division keeps a movement weak, where unity leads to strength.

Historically every nationalist movement that has been successful has started with a diversity of movements that coalesced into a unified front. Now every year the movement spends likely hundreds of thousands of dollars and countless man hours on leafleting, propaganda videos, billboards and rallies yet this effort is diluted. There is no unified message for the public to grab onto, there is no unified messaging to build brand awareness in the mind of normal citizens.

There is no branding or content control to ensure that everything from spelling errors to cartoonish rhetoric are stopped before they see the light of day. Our efforts as a movement would be magnified under one banner, with one clear and concise message and under direction to ensure that our movements looks, acts and organizes like a real professional political movement.

There were dozens of small nationalist movements in Germany and Greece that have come together under the unified banner of the NPD and Golden Dawn while maintaining the values of the Party and that has allowed the movement to make dramatic gains for the cause of nationalism. This process can’t be forced, of course. The organization which becomes that central organization must constructively audition for the position, not destructively attack others. Coalescing takes time and work. But there should be a general effort towards unity.

We will need to of course make compromises and allow representation of a variety of groups on the Board of Directors of the umbrella Party. We must also ensure the Party is grounded on a firm ideological foundation that refuses to change based on whims of individuals. Success will be based around proper presentation, messaging, ideology, and other factors. A tent that is too wide will fall in on itself and that is why we cannot trade away our dearly held beliefs for the sake of mere numbers.

Thing That Must Go #3: Support for Capitalism

There are few things more evil in the modern age than capitalism. Working families are attacked by capitalism every single day of their lives and too many believe the phony rhetoric of the elite that we should follow and deify an ideology that puts profits ahead of people. Dr. Goebbels wrote of capitalism in 1932 that,

The worker in a capitalist state—and that is his deepest misfortune—is no longer a living human being, a creator, a maker. He has become a machine. A number, a cog in the machine without sense or understanding. He is alienated from what he produces.”

This alienation plagues modern America and the West as a whole and it must be combated by an economic system that supports the best interests of working families and the nation as a whole.

The model that our Party needs to follow is best described by Gregor Strasser when he said, “We must take from the right nationalism without capitalism and from the left socialism without internationalism.” Capitalism and internationalism are the enemies of our movement and our people and must be dealt with accordingly.

Too many American nationalists are stuck in either being reactionary or living in the worldview of 1950s America during the Cold War in a “Capitalism vs Communism” struggle. In our modern age both capitalism and communism are servants of international finance and multinational corporations and both must die. Our movement cannot defend the ramparts of our enemy’s fortress and except to be successful. The capitalists have drafted the victims of capitalism to fight for it, and our Party must break the people from their gilded chains.

Capitalism is tied intricately with the merchant elite which works to disenfranchise and displace the European peoples. Capitalism turns human beings into commodities serving profits for corporations, instead of proud workers serving the interests of the people and of the nation. If we as nationalists are going to be able to free our people, we must also liberate our economy from the grips of the enemy.

To be true nationalists, we must have a worldview that puts the interests of the people, both physical and spiritual, ahead of any personal petty concerns. Every nationalist Party in Europe that I have met with are economic Third Positionists and this is the model that we should follow here in America.

Thing That Must Go #4: Violent Rhetoric

The rhetoric of much of the America movement is found in the failures of groups that have either disintegrated due to a lack of public support or from attacks by the State and Federal police agencies. There is a huge difference between believing in self defense and gun ownership, which I support, and working to either overthrow the United States government or attack non-Whites because of the color of their skin. Planning illegal activities is not just a good way to end up in prison or dead, it delegitimatizes the struggle for White Americans who are working legally and politically.

The principle of how unnecessary force and violent rhetoric undermining the interests and activities of the pro-White movement stretches back all the way to the Civil Rights battles of the 1960’s. This isn’t about pacifism, courage, radicalism, or passion. It’s about doing what’s best for our people and our struggle. And trust me, if carefully executed violence could achieve anything, it would have achieved something by now. There may well be a time for violence at some point in the future, but it’s definitely not now.

The battle against the forced integration of the South is said by many on both sides of the argument to have been lost with the tragic terrorist bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham Alabama. More and more White Americans on both sides of the Mason-Dixon line were beginning to see that the Federal governments push to forcibly integrate schools and communities at bayonet point was not a good thing, until of course the media was able to capitalize on the callous murder of four young Black girls and use it as a propaganda victory for the pro-integration forces.

Using force against innocent people is also the reason why Martin Luther King Jr. brought his protests to Selma Alabama in 1965. Prior to the marches in Selma, many Southern police departments would simply arrest the Black protesters and outside agitators for breaking local laws while treating them peacefully and with dignity. Martin Luther King Jr. knew he had to be able to use the media to shift public opinion in favor of his movement and peaceful police enforcing the rule of law was not going to give him that propaganda victory that he so desperately needed and craved.

In Selma, Sheriff Jim Clark was known for using police brutality against integration activists so Martin Luther King Jr. knew that he could provoke Sheriff Clark to overreact in front of the media and essentially force the public to side against the Southern people. When a peaceful march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge Sheriff Clark had his men, many of whom were not even police officers, charge into the crowd and beat men, women and children in front of the media.

At that point Alabama Governor George Wallace was gaining support across America for his stand against forced integration. But all of his political work and the work of tens of thousands of White Southerners was undone overnight by Sheriff Clark and his use of unnecessary violence because of the graphic images that were broadcast to tens of millions of Americans on the six o’clock news. If the movement against forced integration had remained peaceful and political it is likely that history might have ended up differently for not only the Southern people, but all Whites in America.

In the post-1960s White Nationalist movement, there has been a fascination with militia movements and an idea of fighting the United States government. These projects have failed one-by-one or have been destroyed as seen with the White Patriot Party that “declared war” on the US government. Historically, violence has only worked after the hearts and minds of the people had been won and only after peaceful avenues had been thoroughly discredited. That’s not our situation.

The work ahead of us will be hard and inglorious. It will involve countless hours of handing out leaflets, attending rallies, organizing soup kitchens, helping the poor, patiently networking, and mobilizing the workers. This is the work that real revolution comes from, not bombastic and short-sighted calls to violence. If violence would work in our situation, then Anders Breivik would have started a political revolution. Timothy McVeigh would have kickstarted a massive resistance against the Federal authorities.

Whether or not our problems can be solved at the ballet, we certainly can’t solve it with bullets.

The reality of many of these militia groups or organizations that talk about “Racial Holy War” are either made up of men who for whatever reason could never be real soldiers, play-actors, or government agents. Countless groups have been taken down by Federal informants due to the fact that members actively seek out to buy illegal weapons, commit terrorist acts, or have loose lips when it comes to saying things that cross the boundary from free speech to incitement for violence.

If you are organizing peacefully and politically, even if the government works to infiltrate you these informants will have nothing to report. The government will have no cause to dismantle your Party and your work can continue in working to mobilize our people to speak up for their best interests. The federal government’s trying to take you down. Don’t make their job easier by falling into their tiresome and predictable script.

 

Thing That Must Go #5: Acting Fringe

The White Nationalist movement has long fallen into a self-fulfilling prophecy. The media tells us that we are fringe angry outsiders and thus many groups and individuals turn themselves into actual Hollywood stereotypes and caricatures. The love of one’s people and culture is so rooted in human biology that even children as young as a few months old experience a closer affinity to those who look like them. Nationalism is literally in the blood, so there is no reason that is be considered on the fringe of our society, only an enemy media and our own missteps have led us to this place.

One of the major failures of our movement is believing in the myths that the media creates about our movement. A good example is how the media says that all National Socialists were frothing at the mouth wanting to hurt and kill Jews, homosexuals, non-Whites, and other groups of people. In reality, the mission of National Socialism was working to help men and women to become more moral, physically healthy and heroic in their defense and service for their nation, their God and their extended family.

When you confirm with your thoughts or actions that nationalism and socialism are about hatred, violence, and misanthropy, you’re clapping along with the enemy’s propaganda.

In the modern age if you describe yourself as a National Socialist, you should be focused entirely on mentoring young people, honoring your culture and folk traditions, settling down with a family to have children, and working politically for the preservation of your ethnicity. Nowhere in being a National Socialist should be race-based hatred of other groups, using racial slurs against non-Whites, or promoting lifestyles that degrade the physical and spiritual health of our nation.

Films like American History X, Romper Stomper, and countless Jerry Springer episodes and “documentaries” on the History Channel have put forward that nationalists are violent, hateful, and degenerate. If you want to be part of a “scene” then steer clear of constructive activist projects. If you want to be a nationalist, you must reject all of this and instead embrace a movement built on love, respect, sacrifice, and hard work. As G.K Chesteron said  “The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him.” We are not cartoons, we are a culture with a noble history that we must live up to.

The movement is at a crossroads, we can continue to remain politically impotent and ostracized from the community we are working to save or we can professionalize, rally behind a strong Party, and begin moving towards engaging our society in a positive and productive way. My hope is that the leaders and members of various groups can come together under the banner of the Traditionalist Worker Party, with each leader and group represented. Together we take lessons from Europe and here at home to craft a Party that will truly become the voice of the American White working and middle class. The future belongs to us, but only if we seize these opportunities and march forward as a unified front.


  • EricStriker

    I’m with you 100% . Everything the American paleo-conservative and WN movement has done, and now is doing, is completely wrong. We need to break completely from conservatism and Jewish way of perceiving the world, and create an ideology that genuinely resonates with every day white people.

    Panderers, elitists, reactionaries, eccentrics, and such must be done away with. No compromises , except on who gets to pop the champagne at the final victory!

  • Light Division

    So this is your Michael Collins turn, huh? You’re not going to stop naming the Jew now, are you?? “International bankers” and “globalist elite”… uh-huh.

    I trust that you realize that this is a spiritual battle, and that the same people who begged that “His blood be on our hands, and the hands of our children” (Mt. 27:25) are the people who seek to destroy the remnants of Christ’s kingdom today. I know you know this, and I hope you don’t allow this fundamental truth to get flushed out of the “official message”.

    Capitalism is merely a mechanism. Marx showed that socialist ideals can be perverted by the same forces… the problem is much deeper, much more profound. The (((international bankers))) couldn’t care less whether we embrace capitalism, communism, socialism, or third-positionism as long as we reject Christ. That is what they are after, and they are only doing their Master’s bidding. Once you fully understand and accept this, which I believe you do/have, Mr. Heimbach, then all the “macro” behaviors of our Enemies make perfect sense.

    Anyway, I’m sure you’ve prayed extensively about your new political endeavors and I trust that God will lead you in the right direction. I have a lot of respect for your voice and your activism, and I know you’ll continue to defend our People and our Faith to the best of your ability. Deo Vindice

    • He’s not going to stop naming the Jew. That’s not what he’s saying.

      Besides, if he does, the rest of us will pick up the slack.

    • We aren’t going to stop exposing the Jewish role in our current political situation. End of story, case closed.

    • debbieakbar

      In your case hopefully soon casket closed.

    • LHathaway

      What’s ‘the jewish role’ to give you someone besides blacks to blame?

    • debbieakbar

      What a fucking hoot. The Parrott is promising to Parrot you!! Please get me a kleenex!

    • debbieakbar

      Hopefully he will and send you all where you belong if ISIS does not get you first. Alahuakbar is the new Seig Heil heard in Germany these days.

    • EricStriker

      Debbie must be a Cruz slag . Now that bulldykes are being accepted into frontline roles in the military, I nominate Debbie to go fight some stupid ass war for Israel that’s none of our business against “radical Islam”.

      If Israel and America stopped intervening in Syria, the Iranians, Syrians , Russians, and Hezbollah would’ve gotten rid of ISIS a long time ago.

    • debbieakbar

      And if der understupunfartenfuher Eric had his way Jimmie would no doubt be where he belongs which is definitely not here.
      Berlin is calling Eric. Speckenzie Arabic?

  • Christian Talour

    I agree with 90% of what your saying. But I also see a need for some of that “dry academic language” that deals with HBD issues. I think telling the truth about ethnic differences is important.

    • EricStriker

      How much of the “blacks commit all the gun crime” stuff do we really need? Virtually every single major industrial zone in the United States has a non-white population in the double digit percentages, and sometimes as a majority–people see this first hand every time they go see a baseball game . If whites , even liberal whites, thought for a millisecond that the races were equal, they wouldn’t waste 3-4 hours every day commuting to work in these “vibrant cities” from their suburbs to keep their families safe and sound.

  • KO

    Good piece. But is it feasible to exclude “supremacism”? I want to live in a community in which traditional white American culture dominates and shapes each institution, including political institutions characterized by the self-government of people sharing that culture and heritage. To the extent the community includes people of other cultures, they will inevitably be subject to the “supremacy” of my culture. (Just as we are subject to “international capitalist supremacy” now.) In other words, I want my culture and values to be “supreme” in the community I inhabit.
    From that point of view, the choice is between supremacy or surrender.

    • Fr. John+

      Matthew- You make some cogent points, but miss the ‘nationalist’ forest, for the ‘racial’ trees… or is it the other way around?

      The point is, you quote St. Codreneau. His position is tenable in Romania, for a number of reasons, that is UNTENABLE here in the USA, that you have to acknowledge:

      1) Romanians are a distinct liguistic, racial, and cultural group, in a geographic area that has isolated them for CENTURIES; they are Latins, living in the midst of Slavs, to put it bluntly. And have been since at least ROMAN (i.e., ROMAN-ia?) times. We in the USA have not been that- EVER. Well, we may have been Anglo, and we may have been Majority white after that, but NOT, since at least 1960, if ever. The book that Hunter Wallace dissected and wrote about, called ’10 Nations’, clearly shows this reality to be not only a possibility, but a distinct fact, that we in the USA have AVOIDED talking about, for at least 150 years (since the WBTS)- We are not one nation, we are MANY NATIONS, that can barely tolerate each other.

      http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2011/10/10/review-american-nations/

      In my own upper Midwest, the passive-aggressive nature of the majority Scandic populations of ND, SD, MN, IA, and the Germano-Scandics of WI, have a cultural precedent- known as “Jante Law.” When I had my blog, I wrote about it. It is a NECESSARY part of understanding the vagaries of the ‘other world’ that is Lake Woebegon. And it’s not only inbred, it’s part of the ‘lens’ through which Lutheranism is viewed, expressed, and promulgated. And that’s just ONE area in the Deca-pseudo-nation, known as the USA.

      Yet, in your post, you seem to think that Yankees and Dixie folk are ‘all the same’- let alone the total “XENOS” mindset of Blacks and Mexicans- for they are NOT ‘Hispanics’- those are people who are European, from Spain. [To even conflate those two terms is something they don’t relish, nor honor.]

      From a historical POV, the last time a 90% White US existed was right at the time of my birth. And that was over a half-century ago.

      We also have to deal with another MAJOR element, that will preclude ANY sort of scenario that you envision.

      2) Romania is an ORTHODOX nation, and has been for what, again? Several Centuries, I would wager:

      “Evidence of Christian communities has been found in the territory of modern Romaniaat over a hundred archaeological sites from the 3rd and 4th centuries.”
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Christianity_in_Romania

      Wheras, in the USA, we have NEVER- as a Nation- been Orthodox. Schismatic Protestants, of over 25,000 jurisdictions, sects, etc. – as you learned in your AOC Catechesis class, no doubt (!) but Orthodox? NO.

      We are nowhere near the unanimity of religion, even of St. Codreneau’s position in the 1920’s, let alone Cyril and Methodius of the Roman Empire, in America!

      And no hope can be had, apart from some very simple, ‘Make America WHITE Again’ is going to have any success, at this point. And that’s about all I can hope for, with the ‘Absolute Leader’ of the GOP, as Mr. Putin has said of THE DONALD.

      As HW has noted in a book review he did, on another front- OD has FINALLY had some rather cogent insights on ‘regime change’ that should be noted, used, and propagandized by the ‘Right.’ But that’s about as far as it is going to go for the next twenty years, frankly…

      here- http://www.occidentaldissent.c

      “Lind argues there have been three American Republics: the First Republic, which lasted from Washington to Lincoln, the Second Republic, which lasted from Lincoln to FDR, and the Third Republic, which lasted from FDR to Obama. According to Lind, we are now going through a turbulent transition period – the equivalent of the Civil War or Great Depression – to an undetermined Fourth Republic. Several scholars have argued that the constitutional departures of Lincoln and FDR were so radical that these two presidents effectively created new regimes.

      Elsewhere, Lind has argued that the last president of each republic tends to be a failed leader – a James Buchanan or a Herbert Hoover, an embodiment of the previous discredited order who is unable to respond to a systemic crisis – and that the Fourth Republic began with Obama. Perhaps it is Obama though who better represents the last president in FDR’s line and the current crisis of the regime – driven by anxiety over trade, immigration, and terrorism – will bring Donald Trump to power as the first president of the Fourth Republic?”

      I think you have not yet thrown off the ‘we’re all one race, the human race’ GARBAGE that you were taught in your entire edumificational ‘career’ as well as the same BS taught as ‘the Faith’ among the Novus Ordo heretics in SCOBA. You are not yet fully illumined, to be blunt. May God grant you that vision of his Heavenly Jerusalem- but don’t confuse it with either the Filioquist Whore of Babylon’s “invite the world, invade the world, ‘catholi-schism,’ ” or the ‘filioque lite’ heresies of the Pseudo-dox.

    • debbieakbar

      ???????????????????????? Classic strategy: If you can’t win confuse the hell out of them.

    • debbieakbar

      You stole that line from ISIS, or maybe you are?

  • AnAnon

    “Hispanics are immigrating by the tens of millions into America primarily because of Western-backed destabilization of their nations’ economic and foreign policies during the Cold War and current Free Trade Agreements like NAFTA.” – While free trade is something I never supported, what happened in Mexico was that the Mexican elite, fresh from signing NAFTA, devalued the peso in 1994, triggering a massive crisis there. This destroyed the wages and savings of the Mexican people. NAFTA as a whole has transferred some 50 Billion dollars per year to their economy, Someone there is gaining at our expense, and this is why things are getting worse in both nations as a result of NAFTA.

    “When political and economic stability return to areas” – The problems in Mexico, such as the aforementioned currency issue, are not the sort of thing that can be fixed easily. They will have quite a bit of work and suffering in front of them, and its going to not be a quick fix for our concerns assuming that they are determined to fix these problems.

  • Waljoy

    Thank you for a very good article, Matt, and I do believe you are right on in what you are saying here. Thanks very much for everything you do for our cause ~ God bless you and your dear family ~! 🙂

  • German-American

    AGREED COMPLETELY! Heimbach and his men continue to demonstrate a clarity of vision and far-sightedness greater than any other US nationalists. The point about supremicism is the most true, the most urgent, yet will be the hardest to beat into the heads of Americans, partially because we have here such a sports-based culture of winning, test scores, the competitive nature of predatory capitalism and because of deep-rooted “City on the Hill” Puritan Old Testament fantasies about American exceptionalism. Americans always want to be the best and when you implant racialism in these people often times their first impulse is to justify their new beliefs in terms of objective supremacy. As a nationalist, however, I don’t care if it can be “scientifically” proven that my people are the dumbest, ugliest, most dysfunctional race on Earth: they’re MY people and I’m going to love them and fight for them the same as I would my own family. If my kid is a top athlete and makes the honor roll, I’ll be proud of him, but if he gets cut from the team and makes poor grades, I’m not going to dump him for another kid because that other kid is “objectively” superior. He’s my family and I’ll do all in my power to help him improve, but regardless I’ll love him unconditionally and fight for him first. In the same way we must free ourselves of this decadent American capitalist need to prove our superiority objectively as the basis of our struggle, love our racial blood family unconditionally and with total one-sided subjectivity. Even A.H. didn’t set out to measure German superiority first before he could justify fighting for it, his love for Germany started with Wagner and with art and culture, with a passionate romantic attachment to all things German, not a comparative analysis of I.Q. scores of various nations. In fact he died stating “love and loyalty to my people have guided all my thoughts, my actions and my life” — not one word about being superior or needing to justify his actions through claims of objective superiority. This is perhaps the greatest mental attitude that has held us back in the United States and will be the hardest habit to break, but Mr. Heimbach here bravely makes a point that will have revolutionary significance for the victory of the movement here in the Untied States.

    • Thank you so much comrade! As you said, we love our extended family because they are our extended family! I love my son no matter what because he is my flesh and blood, likewise my brothers and sisters by blood are my family and it is my duty to care for them. Nationalism is a movement based on compassion for the mind, body and souls of our people

    • debbieakbar

      SEiG HEIL, SEIG HEIL SEIG HEIL FUCKING NAZI!

    • u mad, sis?

    • debbieakbar

      Polly IS a cracker?

    • debbieakbar

      A.H. your hero Adolf Hitler killed millions just like me and your insane hero did exactly all you said he did not do. Your perfect German went apoplectic when Jesse Owens won an Olympic medal. He jumped up and down and stomped like a kid who had his candy taken away!
      Did you know thatGerman soldiers were taught blacks had tails. One friend of mine who was there after the war said some of the Germans were looking for his.
      Hey, James show him yours. No not your little ding a ling James! Put it away you are not with your prison buddies.
      You can take the German out of Germany but you cannot take the Nazi out of this German who would have made a better Goebbel than Goebbel who lovingly gave his entire family cyanide no doubt while listening to Wagner. We know what happened to your precious one ball Adolf. They poured gasoline over his body and lit it. This is what the Germans were really good at..
      Adolf would have a good laugh at what is happening in Germany today. As Rev Wright would say the chickens are coming home to roost. The Arabs know the Germans share their anti- semitism. What the Germans have not figured out yet is that they want to take over your “Faderlundt” Islam Uber Alles this time! Better Germany than Israel. PS Adolf refused to shake hands with Jesse Owens. Here you guys are kissing each others Heinis over your common hatred of Jews. All you a-holes can gai Plotz! I read some of the below. Almost choked after “light division” (emphasis on not too heavy}. Stonewall Jackson would puke at reading it. LD’s ancestors no doubt OWNED a few of your ancestors James. Then again maybe they were just field “Crackers” and “Motherfuckers” who raided the cabins for some Poontang. No doubt his contemperary white hoods had something to do with the Klan murders of those three civil rights workers Goodman Cheney and Schwerner (Mickey Schwerner was my high school Biology teachers son.) Two Jews and an African American trying to help Southern Blacks get the vote.
      What a bunch of maggots this shit site attracts. I am getting off, the stench is overwhelming me.

    • JimmyWells

      Prove Hitler killed millions of Jews. Not some bullshit hearsay stories either. True facts! I’ve looked into you discussion history and it’s clear you’re waging some sort of “war” on those who disagree with you. Newsflash: You won’t win.

    • debbieakbar

      From now on you will have to prove you can say anything else but “prove” which could go a long way to prove you are human. You cannot prove anything to a fucking bigot like yourself. Look up bigot, If it says look in the mirror bingo!
      I already won, Your inferior infantile brain is no match for the least intelligent of my race.
      You are history as you are still a slave mentally. A classic Dre(meaning nothing) Kup (meaning head). You probably would have to go on Maury to PROVE who your daddy wasl Even Mathew Heimbach knows that, though I question he has a soul or a people if he calls the likes of you “Comrade”.
      The “goose step” meets “hip hop”. What a hoot! Shalom Dre Kups.

    • JimmyWells

      So no proof? Somehow I knew you would say that.

    • debbieakbar

      First prove that is not a white rubber dildo in your mouth. Second, prove that slavery ever existed in the United States. I know it did but asking a drekup like yourself to prove it is a joke.
      Third prove who your father was as I know for a fact that the height of confusion in your life has always been fathers day.
      As your mouth is an open sewer. I can only think of one word to describe your ass which you no doubt hear daily from your own race.
      For now I am finished with you and from the lack of further commentary I am not the first and likely will the last.
      I advise you not to get me started on your moma. You are out of your league.

  • The Dead Baron (Dindu Nathan’)

    I strongly disagree with your first point.

    We discredit ourselves when we deny that most of us to feel a sense of superiority, especially over blacks and browns.

    We see constant examples of black and brown incompetence (not to mention violence and many other undesirable traits) in spite of extreme measures to hide, correct, excuse and empower them. There’s absolutely no reason we should embrace, or even tolerate, any semblance of egalitarianism: if they want equality, be equal. Until then, we must not be complicit in enabling their degeneracy.

    Anything short of aknowledging this premise is disingenuous and intellectually dishonest.

    Those who would be turned-off by such evident truths are of no use to us.

    • The Dead Baron (Dindu Nathan’)

      In fact, the refugee crises serves to illustrate, in three very concise points, the scope of white supremacy.

      I. That whites create supreme civilizations and societies which nonwhites can’t replicate, thereby creating great disparities in quality of life which nonwhites seek to bridge by stealth.

      II. That as much as nonwhites covet white civilization and would seek to overtake us, they lack the means to, and therefore, by their own power, have no realistic opportunity to pose a threat – unless aided by sympathetic whites.

      III. The Supreme benevolence of whites compels some among us to be sympathetic to the point where they will willingly open the gates to invaders who would seek to displace us.

    • The Dead Baron (Dindu Nathan’)

      This isn’t rhetorical: as someone who’s extremely interested in your movement/organization, I was expecting a rebuttal.

    • EricStriker

      What is white civilization? The Greeks and romans? The Medieval Christians? Today’s Judeo-liberal degenerating and world-destroying plutocracy?

      Mechanically speaking, majority white societies are better in the individual and short-term. But compared to the Chinese, we’re not going anywhere but down at the moment. Our culture’s stagnating, our people are becoming physically, morally, and spiritually less attractive by the second. Let’s not pat ourselves on the back yet, better to be humble and exceed our goals, than be arrogant and miss the mark.

      PS,
      The problem isn’t sympathetic whites, it’s filthy Jews and certain (largely trust fund WASP) bourgeois who indeed are “ethnomasochists”, but only because Jews dictate the values of the upper middle class as they are the gatekeepers. White working people are rallying behind Trump’s wall, that alone shows you that “suicidal white benevolence”, outside of genuine ethics, is not the problem except in the eyes of Kike-placaters and paleo-cons pretending to be racial nationalists.

    • The Dead Baron (Dindu Nathan’)

      I’ll respond point-by-point soon, but my initial response to your comment is that we, as a society, are actually being humble and missing the mark.
      Much better to be arrogant and exceed our goals: its working for the interior blacks and jews. But ONLY because of our humility.

    • EricStriker

      Blacks don’t have any goals. They are a headless chicken Jews occasionally agitate and direct. Pretending non-whites are organized in a conspiracy, rather than the truth that they are merely pawns looking to satisfy their material appettites in the most primal, incoherent fashion, makes me wonder what kind of non-whites you know.

      Whites today aren’t humble, we’re oppressed. Jews silence us when we speak out using violence, economic sanctions, and character assassination.

    • The Dead Baron (Dindu Nathan’)

      They seem to be getting pretty good at procuring white wimmins, out-reproducing us and dominating popular culture.

      That means, though not controlling the narrative (jews do that) but being, at least in the short term, the beneficiaries of the narrative.

      Nonwhites I know? I know none. I fucking purge degenerates and inferiors.

    • First of all, supremacy implies two separate and distinct things. It can imply a sense of objective superiority and it can imply a right or obligation of one to dominate the other. The latter is not only immoral, it’s logistically unstable and antithetical to our survival as a separate and distinct people.

      The former, confirming our objective supremacy, is also both problematic and counter-productive. Naturally, we’re superior relative to our own metrics. So are they. There’s no objective metric of societal value. Let’s consider malaria resistance, minimal environmental footprint, masculine aggression, and basketball the metric of human performance and see how we stack up.

      A strong case can be made that East Asians are more intelligent, have a superior track record of developing and sustaining harmonious and stable societies, and more rigorously maintain honor cultures. Jews have a strong case for their own superiority relative to their preferred metrics (Just ask them!), Indians have a rich traditional culture which has outlasted our own by several millennia.

      Obviously, I think being White is awesome. I’m glad to be White. I’m proud of being White. I look at the sorts of things my people generally do and the kinds of communities my people generally create and that’s what I strongly prefer. I’m a White Nationalist whose life’s work is the preservation of my people, after all.

      But it’s neither noble nor gainful nor even technically correct to insist that our people are objectively supreme. It boils down to a metaphysical issue of first principles. If your philosophical outlook entails that the greatest objective good is technological innovation, decreased crime, and delightful art, then you’ve got yourself a case within that construct for white supremacy. It’s not my own construct, though.

    • Jack Spratt

      You’re judging different races by cultural artifacts and external products, such as art and proficiency at basketball, as if the goal of a race is to produce things that are of greater “objective value”.

      But the main thing a race produces is people, and anyone who’s spent time interacting with different kinds of people realizes that there’s no kind of person that averages out to being up to the quality of Whites other than Ashkenazi Jews (who are part White in their ancestry).

      This is reflected in the simple fact that Obama is considered Black. If even Blacks actually thought they were superior, a half-White would’ve been rejected as a non-Black. But Blacks understand their inferiority, and this is reflected in their desire to steal genes from Whites.

      Even the most namby pamby White liberal is a bigger believer in White supremacy than any Black is in Black supremacy. This is reflected in the fact that no White liberal has seriously claimed a half-breed to be White (save for cases where their desperate need for a “Great White Defendant” led them to lie about the racial identity of George Zimmerman and Daniel Holtzclaw).

      “If your philosophical outlook entails that the greatest objective good is technological innovation, decreased crime, and delightful art, then you’ve got yourself a case within that construct for white supremacy.”

      Whites aren’t just better at technological innovation, but rather innovation period. This may or may not be a good thing in the grand sweep of things, but regardless the meaning of the word superior means being of higher quality. Whites are clearly higher quality to East Asians, Black, Arabs, etc. as a race when it comes to innovation.

    • The Dead Baron (Dindu Nathan’)

      Is anyone reading this?
      Is anyone reading this site??
      Just curious.

    • Jack Spratt

      I am.

    • EricStriker

      Whites are a superior race, but that doesn’t mean that it matters in the political context or that you constantly have to be redundantly iterating the obvious. If all blacks were Dr Huxtable and all whites were low lives (and many whites are) , I’d still prefer to live around my own. That’s the point of ethnic nationalism.

      If whites are superior it ought to be self-evident. Right now, we’re being exterminated off the face of the earth by a minority of people (Jews) who we outnumber greatly. Are we truly superior to the Arab Muslims of Hezbollah that are willing to blow himself up or fall in the battlefield against Israel so that his people can live free?

      There’s quite a few gray areas, and too many people treat the things whites are good at to improve their personal self-esteem, rather than the real argument: whether we’re superior or not, we have the right to exist as a distinct species.

    • The Dead Baron (Dindu Nathan’)

      When morale is as low as it is especially amongst normies/the blue-pilled, I have to disagree.

      We need to be constantly reiterating and demonstrating our superiority. The success of recent hashtag campaigns is evidence of the efficacy of self-promotion and aggrandization over the unfortunately ubiquitous self-deprecation amongst beta faggot whites.

  • ps mike

    Is Trad Worker working with or competing with the American Freedom Party?

    • We’re working with and personally friends with just about all of the AFP leadership. For several months before launching, we attempted to broker an arrangement where we’re a caucus underneath the AFP umbrella. Strategic and stylistic differences necessitate forming separate parties, but they’re an excellent organization and we don’t see ourselves in direct competition with them.

  • Shotgun

    I’ll weigh in here on the side of the much maligned supremacists and note that it seems ironic to desire an ideological change throughout the populace while also claiming there’s no objective metric by which to measure which object (hypothetical object A, or hypothetical object B) is superior to the other. If that’s true, then there must not be a way to measure ideologies against each other either and the entire political enterprise is superfluous.

    No, as a Christian, I strongly believe there *is* an objective metric, and in our case (the case of racial groups – however they might be defined and conceived), God loves the white race more than He loves all the others. We’re His standard bearers and when, in the course of our comings and goings, we happen upon atrocities and barbarous horrors which are the norm in many cultures, our Christian hearts cry out “THIS SHALL NOT GO ON!” We don’t wrestle with our inner egalitarian about the rightness of imposing cultural norms…God forbid it. No. We crusade, chop heads, and bring beauty, civilization, and the jurisdiction of Christendom.

    Our people are superior because God has made us superior and the day we pick up our standard and wave it again is the day we return to our task of ringing in the new Jerusalem on this fair Earth which has been given to us as the new promised land.

    Give me a political party with *that* as its goal.

  • JimmyWells

    I agree with most of the article but as far as I know there isn’t a better system than capitalism for us in the States. I wouldn’t want anything to do with ANYTHING even remotely close to communism. The Jew’s preferred method of government. Communists have been tearing this country apart for a very long time. Even as far back as the late 1700’s. It’s only a matter of time before they attempt a takeover like they’ve always done throughout history.

    • debbieakbar

      FYI Asshole Marx was not even alive. There was no word “communism” in the 1700dreds You Jew hating, nose picking down low prison bitch.

    • JimmyWells

      Oy vey, I love it when commie Jews are all up on my dick. No better head than Red head. Marx would be proud of your oral skills.

    • debbieakbar

      OY VEY the SHWARTZER knows a bissel Yiddish! And what a GROSSER SHMECKLE dis PUTZ is sucking on in his picture. I heard of big fish eating little fish. This looks like little dick eating big dick.
      PS Red Fox would choke if the was still around to hear you. Elizatbeth HEEEEELLP! He’s cumming Elizabeth!!!

    • JimmyWells
    • debbieakbar

      Good grief Obama has a twin named JimmyWells!!!! Who would have guessed?

  • Jason Claar

    Having traveled with Matt in Europe, on this most recent trip, I have reached the same conclusions the he has. I am an early Generation X’er (1962), who comes to the movement from the New Right (I don’t have the baggage of Old Right ideas or associations) and Matt’s four points conform to my experience thus far.

    There will be disagreements concerning his conclusions. We all have the responsibility to find common cause with each other and not to become mired down with in-fighting. If you can’t tolerate your own kith and kin in spite of disagreements, then you probably won’t tolerate anyone beside yourself.

    We must not walk individually in the long march to reclaim our cultural institutions. As our American forefathers said, “Unite or Die.”

  • promethius

    Your doing gods work

tradworker

By: Matthew Heimbach



%d bloggers like this: