ChemSex: The West Slips Even Further Into the Abyss


NSFW

Sarah Knapton, a science editor for The Telegraph, warns that, “An alarming new craze for lengthy drug-fuelled sex sessions, which can last for days a time, could lead to a rise in HIV and hepatitis.” The article is neither sensationalist nor moralistic, and takes pains to clarify that it’s a statistically relevant phenomenon that’s actually a thing rather than, say, a fever dream concocted from a few anecdotes by right-wing fundies. Several mainstream media outlets are reporting on it, with corroboration from multiple respected research journals and public health professionals.

The practice, dubbed ‘chemsex’ has been reported by more than 60 per cent of people visiting some clinics in London and involves people taking drugs like crystal meth before embarking on 72 hour sex binges with multiple partners.

The study she cites carefully lists the drugs typically relied upon to keep all the folks in the orgy going at it for several days straight. The drugs ingested include, but are not necessarily limited to: “mephedrone, γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), γ-butyrolactone (GBL), and crystallised methamphetamine. These drugs are often used in combination to facilitate sexual sessions lasting several hours or days with multiple sexual partners.”

“Chemsex is a rapidly emerging pattern of drug use, not just amongst men who have sex with men as often assumed, but heterosexual patients as well,” said Dr Richard Ma of the Royal College of GPs’ Sex Drugs Group.

“Taking recreational drugs during sex can lead to a number of potentially harmful side effects including facilitating the spread of common STIs and HIV, but also serious mental health problems, such as anxiety, psychoses and suicidal tendencies.

The article takes pains to repeatedly insist that it’s not only male homosexuals getting mixed up in this stuff, but a touch of common sense and a cursory review of the raw research cited, including “Illicit drug use in sexual settings (‘chemsex’) and HIV/STI transmission risk behaviour among gay men in south London: findings from a qualitative study,” confirms that it’s pretty much a gay subcultural thing, as outlined in Eric Striker’s recent article for our site.

In an editorial in the British Medical Journal experts warned that the growing popularity of ‘chemsex’ may be putting users at risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections as well as serious mental health problems through drug dependence.

They are also at greater risk of overdosing, being hospitalised, losing consciousness, having panic attacks or convulsions, and becoming the victim of sexual assault.

I don’t know if “risk” is the right word for what’s going on here. A man who snorts enough meth to stay up for three straight days and gobbles enough GHB to tolerate the unspeakable pain of repeated and aggressive sodomization by multiple anonymous partners isn’t really “risking” disease and drug dependency.

What next? “Leaping in front of oncoming trains may increase mortality risk.”

Although widespread data is lacking, Antidote, a specialist drugs service for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender community in London, around 64 per cent of attendees seeking reported using chemsex drugs in 2013-14. Around three quarters reporting injecting drug use.

While I accept that most likely a minority subset of homosexuals and sexual paraphiliacs are this frightfully self-destructive, the myth that this whole thing is some irrelevant marginalized fringe within an otherwise family-friendly LGBTQ subculture isn’t holding up to empirical review. It’s an actual thing and it’s an actual problem. A statistically meaningful subset of the homosexuals who are supposedly as lovably innocuous as the characters on Will & Grace are snorting meth and poz’ing one another for longer than it takes to watch the entire Will & Grace box set series.

Jamie Willis, one of the report authors from the charity London Friend said: “Traditionally chemsex, as we now understand it, has been associated with the ‘men having sex with men’ population but historically the LGBT community have been seen as early indicators of new trends.

A society in which cultural trends tend to radiate from drug-fueled and diseased orgies is a society which would do well to begin reflecting on its first principles. Or perhaps be burned to the ground, the earth salted, and the names of its citizens stricken from the book of life? Just kidding, …sorta. My position is controversial, unpopular, and alienating to many folks in the New Right. Many believe we should focus exclusively on identity and strive to keep up with popular culture, synthesizing our racial advocacy with the latest trends.

“At present I am not aware of any research into chemsex use in heterosexual communities, however like most drug trends it seems likely chemsex will not remain exclusive to men who have sex with men in future.”

I’ve always had a generally tolerant disposition, and I joke in private that while on paper I’m a traditionalist radical, my actual instincts are to be open-minded, to give people the benefit of the doubt, and to respect peoples’ private decisions and private lives. But there comes a point when enough is enough, when private degeneracy becomes so outrageous and extreme that it threatens public life, that a line must necessarily be drawn in the sand.

For me, identitarianism means holistically fighting against the degradation and destruction of my people. The struggle to push back invaders and roll back White Genocide is inseparable from the struggle to revive the vitality and virtue of our extended family of kindred folk. We must consistently choose life, even if the trendsetters are choosing death.

Ultimately, if we were a healthy people with big loving families and the right priorities, things like border control wouldn’t even be problems. Just a century ago, the border was Mexico’s problem, with waves of settlers steadily encroaching on their lands and communities, because we weren’t yet a socially and sexually defective nation. Trends are what got us into this mess, and identitarians who strive to keep up with current social trends will follow those trends into the abyss.

The problem can indeed be framed in religious terms, and what’s being reported in clinical and matter-of-fact language in our popular press does eerily parallel the darkest chapters of sacred texts. When both ancient biblical stories and dispassionate atheist medical professionals are warning about the same lethal problem, it’s probably time to acknowledge and address the problem. If God’s not around to strike down a people who accept and tolerate this madness, natural processes and less poz’d peoples will continue to do his work for him.


  • So.. slutty gays who go to drug clinics take drugs?

    • It appears so, yes.

    • London is a city of 8.5 million people and the majority of it is now non-white. If you go looking for depravity in London, you’re gonna find it. The actual study referenced by the BMJ talks about 1142 gayers in Lambeth, a london district, of which 10% got doped up in the past month. Given that the sample size is so small and located to an area hedonistic fags actually move to in order to be within striking distance of london bathhouses, there isn’t much of a story here. Like most drug users, these people do it because they have nothing else going on in their lives, and in this case the state funds the treatment anyway. Welfare + equality + boredom = self destruction.

    • Over a million Americans now have AIDS, about a third of whom are White. This sort of thing is a valid consideration, it is increasing in prevalence, and it is not a marginal fundie issue.

      Echoing the researchers, the general pattern is for whatever’s up in the urban and gay communities to eventually fan out into the broader culture, so there is cause for concern that it’s not going to remain limited to a subset of a currently somewhat marginal community.

    • OK. Well, I’m glad I commented and pushed it because this point wasn’t so clearly made in the article. To me at least.

    • EricStriker

      Please tell me you’re a 13 year old girl, and not a 30 something year old “alt right” man.

    • ..?

  • Ezra Pound

    “Ultimately, if we were a healthy people with big loving families and the right priorities, things like border control wouldn’t even be problems.” – Bingo. And this is what our ‘intellectual’/brony friends don’t seem to understand. They argue thus: “You’re just weirded out by SFP’s because you adhere to the kike on a stick cult!” And the proper reply is, “No, I adhere to the kike on a stick cult because I am weirded out by SFP’s.”

  • JMoore

    “And the Lord rained upon Sodom and Gomorrha brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven.” Genesis showing the Divine cure for when this stuff gets completely out of control.

  • 1Lew0

    It’s a complex topic, and my sentiment is that as long as the agenda is not being pushed, homo sex is at the very bottom of my list of concerns. Who cares what people do in private?

    However, I hope oversimplifications, caricatures and false premises on the complex topic of homosexuality never take hold on the emergent right. The notion that if you are not openly (or subtly) approving of gays in public, you can only be a dysfunctional, controlling, unattractive bible-thumpers is a plain false alternative.

    When men who supposedly “are just like us” except for their inclinations create a multi-continent HIV and AIDS crisis, it should be clear from that fact alone that the premise is wrong. This isn’t surprising given it’s a liberal premise. They are not just like us, and the CDC and medical data proves it. While I do not believe they should be harmed or persecuted, a healthy society cannot legitimize that behavior as normal.

    When countering explicit and disguised homosexual propaganda, I would encourage the Christian community to avoid religious arguments other than in internal discussions where outsiders do not participate. Instead, stick to the historical, anthropological and especially scientific evidence on this topic. There is plenty there. They don’t produce children. No stake in society or the future. High incidence of mental illness. All backed by facts.

    And while we are on this subject, while the female side of this activity isn’t as dangerous to public health or viscerally disgusting to most men as male homosexual behavior is (usually the opposite), the female activity still needs to be discouraged. Jews flood the culture with powerfully approving messages for lesbian and bi-female sex for a reason. It’s a genetic dead end. The Jewish ideal, most likely, is for white females to satisfy their need for sex only with other women and/or black males.

    To the Christians, like it or not, religion-based arguments on sex are going to elicit as much indifference toward your views as someone citing Allah to make a point would leave most of you. Again, stay away from them if you watch get anyone’s ear.

    If there are any secularists reading, it should be obvious on reflection there are many ways to distance the emergent right from stale and erotic-phobic religious perspectives on sex without going full-on pro-gay.

    • EricStriker

      I saw some alt-trite faggots talking about how someone who loses a limb or mangles their arm in an accident is forever warped and eugenically worthless. Meanwhile, fucking homos who dine on excrement and stick fists up one another’s rectums are perfectly normal as long as they have a cute haircut, go to the gym, and wear expensive clothes.

    • Joseph Eshleman

      I get what you’re saying though, amputees aren’t the ones with messed up genes.

  • Pingback: Drug Fueled Gay Sex Orgies At Traditional Youth Network! | Hipster Racist()

  • Christian Talour

    This has to be the bottom. Can a society go lower then drug fueled three day long homosexual orgies? It sounds like an elaborate way to commit suicide.

    I’m going to save this article and return to it. Hopefully, write about it. This kind of depravity needs to be addressed. If nothing else, to remind myself why I’m a Christian.

  • Joseph Eshleman

    IDK, if I was gay trying to keep going through a 3 day orgy, I’m not sure GHB and GBL would be the first drugs I’d pick.

    • The trick is mixing up just the right cocktail of uppers to keep you awake and downers to keep you uninhibited and unresponsive to the physical trauma when you load up your AIDS-infested drug needle.

  • TheMadTonez

    I’ve taken speed so I could have sex with my girlfriend for 10 hours. It was fun, didn’t realize that the gays were claiming drug fueled sex as their own. 3 days straight with multiple partners is ridiculous, it’s always just been me and my girlfriend and like I said we would do 10 hour. sexcapades, then sleep, and eat. So no diseases were transferred and we stayed healthy.

    • Heh.

      Now, was this actually a sexcapade, or did it take ten hours to finish the job because of the speed and y’all reframed things to play off like you meant it to go down like that after the fact?

chemsex

By: Matt Parrott


Matt is a founding member of TradYouth and is currently the project's Chief Information Officer. He's been active in the White Identity cause for years, primarily as a blogger but also as a street activist and regional organizer.
%d bloggers like this: