“There was a time in my 20s when everything I learned about the history of racism made me hate myself, my Whiteness, my ancestors… and my descendants,” squawked Ali Michael’s Huffpo act of contrition. “I remember deciding that I couldn’t have biological children because I didn’t want to propagate my privilege biologically.” Ali was writing in defense of Rachel Dolezal, and to encourage the creators and maintainers of Western civilization to forgo reproduction by pretending to be one of us. “If I was going to pass on my privilege, I wanted to pass it on to someone who doesn’t have racial privilege; so I planned to adopt” she followed with anguish.
But there’s a big difference between Jewish Ali Michael and Aryan Rachel Dolezal. Rachel fully distanced herself from her folk and took Ali’s advice to heart by partaking in transracial asexual reproduction (since mulatto kids never seem to have a father). The evils of white privilege embodied by the Dolezal line ended with Rachel, as she turned the race “binary” on its head and ensured she would have no part in producing a child who by his 13th birthday would receive a Red Ryder BB gun and an official Unarmed-Black-Man Hunting License from the Learned Elders of the White Male Power Structure.
But Ali Michael’s “From one white to another, ‘we’ should all hate ourselves and you should feel guilty if you have kids” advice on racial reconciliation doesn’t seem to bode well with her personal life. An important political lesson all host people have learned is that whenever a Jew’s lips are moving, words are fusing together to construct a big, and usually deadly, lie.
Not only is Ali Michael not actually a part of the Western community (instead its historical Jewish antithesis), she also has two biological children (higher than the birth rate of the average couple of virtually every Euro-majority nation) with a fellow Jew, Michael Ramberg.
If Ali’s forked tongue wasn’t infuriating enough, her husband is very much in tune with their truly racist and genocidal culture. He is the head Rabbi and director of the ethnocentric Zionist Hillel organization on the campus of Ursinus College. Her children are raised in a home where the epitome of bigotry, the Talmud, is the head of household’s literal craft.
Both Michael and Ramberg are parents who share race and culture, yet here is Ali, using her media post granted by Jewish (not White!) privilege, to make white Gentiles feel guilty about practicing their human right to reproduce. Even her dissertation on the way to becoming a “Race Consultant” reveals this inner bias by shoveling superlatives on a colleague who yaps on about the superiority of “Jewish Identity” in public school classrooms.
This isn’t a question of cognitive dissonance, as some have theorized. It’s not misguided idealism from the notoriously materialistic tribe. This is Jews when they’re 2%, and don’t have the numbers to treat us like the people of Gaza. This is the passive-aggressive ideological violence that misuses modern technology, weaponizes concentrated capital, and employs blackmail and guilt to convince and compel targets of Jewish venom to gradually thin themselves out.
That is, until Ali and friends figure out the logistics on how to do us like they did the women and children of Cyprus and Cyrene in the Kitos War.
Jewish Baby Boom…Middle East Baby Bust
It seems odd that the global Jewish population is growing at its current immense pace, especially as global trends favor decline in birth rates (including in the third world). It should also be noted that the Jewish population has traditionally been heavily undercounted, so official figures may not quite capture the scope of this demographic rise.
Henry Ford’s researchers dedicated a whole chapter to this question in The International Jew, where they noted that the Jewish population in America was purposely obfuscated in national population counts by using trickery and exploiting technicalities (such as facetiously claiming “Jewish” was a religion, rather than a people, when dealing with Gentile authorities). The reason for this was two-fold: to ease Nativist concerns, as well as to throw off the scent of those looking suspiciously at Woodrow Wilson’s very Jewish political circle. From Wilson on, the traditionally isolationist United States was tranformed into a hated global empire, and its native citizens weren’t happy about the new epoch of permanent costly and deadly adventurism abroad.
In contemporary times the Jewish population worldwide continues to be undercounted by agencies for unknown reasons. One hypothesis could be that this is done to hide discrepancies in the “6 million” atrocity propaganda against the Germans, after the bulk of these 6 million sprung back to life and moved to America and Israel to live happily ever after.
The Jew Donald Kimelman’s Pew Research Center (which deals with a mostly Gentile audience) continued this dishonest habit by promulgating last April (in Jew-for-Gentile media) that Jews would have to wait until the year 2050 to become a paltry 16.1 million worldwide. This figure was recently blown out of the water by the Israeli government commissioned Jewish People Policy Institute, which reported that Jews have already reached this milestone and are currently 16.5 million of the world’s population. An expanded estimate, dealing with individuals who qualify for Israeli citizenship under the country’s race laws, tallies the current Jewish population up to 18.5 million .
While not common knowledge, the Jewish population of Israel has the highest birth rate in the industrialized world, and one of the highest even in the socially conservative, fertile Middle East. At 3.04 children per couple (6.5 for religious Jews), only Yemen, Syria, Jordan and Iraq have a higher birth rate.
What is interesting is that three of these four Arab nations are mired in civil wars that are taking the lives of hundreds of thousands–and in the case of Iraq, millions–of children and young men. The chaos that has erupted in these countries naturally has reduced the population and the birth rate, and Israel is quickly catching up. The catalysts for these wars and deaths, especially in the case of Iraq and Syria, originate with the Zionist controlled United States government, as well Israel itself.
Stability in this region, safe to say, is bad for Jewish interests. Saddam Hussein’s modern and secular Ba’athist socialist project dramatically increased the living standards of Iraqis, reconciled violent tensions between Shia and Sunni, and significantly reduced infant mortality, which by the nineties culminated in Iraq becoming a regional superpower that had the weapons and the men to challenge the oppressive geographical hegemony of the corrupt Arab Gulf States and Israel.
It would be irresponsible to stake the claim, without hard evidence, that Jewish power brokers are purposely creating conditions and conflicts with the sole intent of drastically reducing the birth rate and youth population of countries they see as current or future geopolitical competitors. But the US government’s abusive utilization of the United Nations to compel the world to stop trading food, medicine, and building materials to Iraq after the wanton destruction they endured during the Gulf War–a foreign policy decision that has evoked much curiosity– directly caused the death of 500,000 children under the age of five, and scores of others. Private groups that tried to help relieve this humanitarian crisis even in the most minute ways were punished to the utmost extent of the law by the petty Jews staffing Clinton’s cabinet.
The Jewish Madeline Albright’s chilling response to an inquiry about this man-made famine is at least something to ponder:
In occupied Palestine, where the Israeli government has utilized a variety of avenues to cull the population, the birth rate has plummeted amidst Iraq-style sanctions and perpetual terrorism meant to violently encourage Palestinians to emigrate to Europe and have fewer children. Palestinian fertility has for decades been a subject of neurotic Jewish study, which is mind blowing when one looks at the raw, cynical joy with which they celebrate America’s dwindling white population.
The Israeli military’s doctrine of bombing schools, private residences, refugee centers, and hospitals, with thousands of dead children appearing in the rubble, is done to demoralize the population into submission–as happened with Dresden–but may also be an instrument to slowly put to rest fears of losing Jewish demographic hegemony. Aside from the vastly disproportionate number of small children killed in the 2014 summer attempted invasion of Gaza that prompted worldwide outrage, the siege of Rafah’s hospital and maternity clinic, under attack as doctors and nurses attempted to protect newborn babies seeing light surrounded by scores of stacked corpses, was very symbolic, and led to pleas for mercy by the overwhelmed ministry of health that the United Nations ignored.
In secular Fatah’s West Bank, the birth rate has fallen in conjunction with high emigration rates. In comparison, Jewish colonists moving into West Bank settlements have an astonishing 5 to 7.7 children per family versus the indigenous Palestinian birth rate of 3. Only a fool would say this inverse correlation is a mere coincidence.
Jews Socially Engineer Low White Birth Rate, While Ensuring Their Own Fertility
Those who claim the duality between Jewish “liberalism” in countries that aren’t theirs and fanatical racial supremacism in Israel is derived from cognitive dissonance do not understand them. The extensive retarding effect on Western civilization promulgated by Jewish “intellectuals” versus the borderline neurotic steps to ensure prime conditions for Jewish fertility is not a coincidence.
While proponents of “white suicide” theory have a grain of truth to their claims, the fact of the matter is that most of the economic and social conditions hurting our ability to have families are often exclusively Jewish in origin. The problem of “white suicide” would not exist if Jewish money and nepotism was historically curbed rather than nurtured by primarily liberal Anglo-Saxon (USA and Britain) governments since the times of Cromwell.
The Jewish diaspora, to one degree or another, overwhelmingly supports Israel as a racial state. And Yale’s David B. Davis, in his book In The Image of God (2001) , brags that 76% of America’s most influential intellectuals molding domestic and foreign policy were already Jewish by 1974 (pg. 54). As our elites and social engineers, Jews have earned at least 76% of the blame.
The predominately Jewish role in forcing through or promoting misanthropic, unnatural, and anti-family causes like feminism, neo-liberalism, no-fault divorce, “free love”, abortion, open borders immigration, miscegenation, etc. has been well documented elsewhere. I will focus on how radically different policy in Israel is, in contrast with the vast majority of Jewish individuals (like Ali Michael) and groups fomenting our destruction:
1. No Fault Divorce
The extraordinarily high divorce rate in the West is initiated overwhelmingly by bored women who are provided with generous incentives to destroy their family through socially sanctioned hypergamy. This institution is considered by men to be a massive con when weighing the prospect, or investment, of commitment. In Israel, Jewish men (secular or religious) do not have to worry. The only way a woman can be granted a divorce (or get married) is through a religious court overseen by Rabbis, and only after proving extreme abuse.
While Jews proudly proclaim that the concept of no-fault divorce they champion in our countries is rooted in Judaism, in the Israeli legal system women are only granted such an arbitrary separation after receiving express written consent from their husbands. Is it any wonder that Israel has one of the lowest divorce rates (Rebecca Torstick, Culture and Customs of Israel; pg 131) in the entire “Western” [sic] world?
If there is one cause organized Jewry in the West has a consensus on, it’s the murder of the Gentile unborn. 14 of 28 religious organizations in the “Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice” are Jewish, including the “Women’s League for Conservative Judaism” and Israel-based women’s organization NA’AMAT. It’s worth it to mention that in the 1970‘s, NA’AMAT blew feminist minds by opposing Knesset member Marcia Freedman’s attempt to transplant Roe v. Wade verbatim, which they fanatically endorse in America, to the Jewish state.
In Jewish law, fetuses are not considered human, and abortion is not forbidden. In Israel, legal qualifications in practice only allow women to terminate their pregnancies when their life is threatened, their child has a severe genetic defect, they have conceived through sexual assault or incest, or they are either minors or over forty.
The most drastic difference between Israeli abortion policy and the West, however, is that each woman seeking this service must go before a special committee composed of doctors and social workers to make a case for why she wants to get an abortion. While the strictness of each committee varies, this additional hoop and lack of anonymity has made Jewish women reluctant compared to their Western counterparts. It goes without saying that if a law requiring a bureaucratic cross-examination for an abortion was passed in a white country, organized Jewry would be all over it like a dime bouncing off the floor of a Brooklyn Synagogue.
What is interesting is that Israel’s passive discouragement of abortion isn’t rooted in any moral or religious tradition. According to a New York Times editorial on the matter, it is an emotionally detached and pragmatic socio-political act intended to expand the Jewish race:
“Terminating pregnancies is considered counterintuitive to Zionism, which requires a booming Jewish birthrate to buttress the nationalist claim on the land. The main impetus for legalizing abortion was concern about women’s health and the socioeconomic circumstances of large, poor families, particularly following the wave of Jewish immigration from the Middle East and North Africa. Reproductive autonomy for women was not an integral part of the legislators’ considerations.
Religious fundamentalists in Israel aren’t particularly vocal on the issue. Efrat, the major anti-abortion group in Israel, was founded in 1962 by a Holocaust survivor and originally called the Association for the Encouragement of the Increase in the Birthrate Among the Jewish People.”
Libertarian and conservative Israel-apologists have selective memory when it comes to talking about the Zionist country that organizes wealth in a socialist fashion. Israel’s public health system is easily one of the most meticulous and generous programs of its kind in the world, and 93.5% of land is owned and allocated by the state (which confiscates Arab property in regions such as Galilee, and redistributes it through lease to Jewish settlers).
Economic planning in Israel posits the state as the guardian of the racial collective, and is tailored to stimulate birth rates and provide financial incentives to large families. The Jewish state is more or less a parasitic, Talmudic, and bastardized version of National Socialism, but sorely lacking in Hitler’s ethical Weltanschauung: self-reliance and nationalism for all races.
Israel produces few things of note and spends a higher percentage of its GNP on its military than North Korea, yet, their economy is largely free of international finance assaults, and thus the Jewish people are entitled to a menu of pro-natalist benefits most people in the West can only dream of. Nations like Sweden have similar social policies, but the major difference is that Sweden’s welfare state disproportionately benefits its large non-white population, while Israel has devised a number of tricks to make it difficult for its indigenous Arab citizens to apply.
The national “Fund for Encouraging Birth” (aimed solely at Jews, which would ignite a firestorm from the same people if paralleled in a white country on these terms), gives expecting young families interest-free loans to purchase housing, a valuable commodity more and more Americans, especially those of us in our prime breeding years (18-35) have reduced access to. The fruits of the system aiding in home ownership (and thus nests to start a family) are seen today, with 70% of Israelis being the proprietors of the roof over their heads (OECD Economic Surveys: Israel 2011) vs 42% of Germans, 55% of Frenchmen, and 68% of Americans.
Countries like Spain and Slovenia have somewhat higher rates of home ownership than Israel, but these are mostly inherited dwellings from long gone policies enacted under communism or Francisco Franco’s government. Nonetheless, the fairly young Jewish state is one of the OECD’s leaders in this regard.
Other programs, such as the Law For Family Blessed with Children, attach additional carrots on sticks for especially fertile Jewish couples. The Veteran’s Family Allowance Scheme, established in 1970, significantly multiplies the existing universal monthly child subsidies provided (which increase substantially after the 4th child) for individuals that serve to any extent in the armed forces. The last policy was created to give Jews an additional leg up against Palestinians, since the vast majority of Israelis are legally compelled to serve in some branch of the IDF, while Arabs are forbidden from joining.
Lastly, the Israeli state has sought to artificially engineer a high birth rate by providing the latest in in vitro fertilization, no questions asked, and at no personal cost. Israel has at this point clinched its position as world leader in IVF births through this public service, while at the same time the Israeli health care system does not provide assistance for contraception. Of course, in America, Zionist organizations united as one to try and force the “Hobby Lobby” chain to provide free contraception to its majority white staff across the country. But mysteriously, in the state that enjoys their true allegiance, sperms meet eggs, eggs are laid in nests, and little chicklets are fed, clothed, educated, and martially trained by the racial commune as one.
Ayn Rand’s individualist acid may have corroded the brains of goy conservatives, but she lavishes praise onto John Galt-berg when he pays Israel’s 50% capital gains tax on his corporate profits:
Europe in 2250 (If the Jews are not stopped)
Western people are pretty much reproducing at below replacement level, and the economic and social factors that have coalesced to slowly sterilize us are largely Jewish in origin. Jews have long surpassed us in the baby war, and the agony of racial decline is painful enough on its own merit. I bet the prospect of Europe’s children becoming Gazans in a few generations may have never crossed your mind, …but it plays in neurotic reruns in theirs.
This emerging dynamic can already be seen in the thinly veiled hypotheticals of Jewish policy-making think tanks. The highly influential Jewish intellectual, David P. Goldman, licks his lips with allusions to the “prospects” of a future Jewish population with more military age men than fragmented and weak Europe’s largest nations. In an entry for The Jewish Policy Center titled “Israel’s Demographic Miracle”, Goldman wrote of the possibilities as follows:
“An Israeli fertility rate of nearly 3 births per woman exceeds the industrial nations’ norm by such a wide margin that Israel—assuming that fertility remains unchanged—will have a larger population than Poland by 2085. Poland’s median age, moreover, will be 57, an outcome impossible for the Polish state to manage (because the majority of Poles in that case would be elderly dependents), while Israel’s median age will be only 32. Even more remarkable is that Israel will have more young people than Italy or Spain and as many as Germany by the end of the century if fertility remains unchanged. A century and a half after the Holocaust, that is, the Jewish State will have more military-age men, and will be able to field a larger land army, than Germany.”
The specific singling out of Poland, Germany, Italy, and Spain in this comparison is interesting. Goldman’s prediction could also apply to more visible world powers than Poland, such as the United Kingdom and France, but he consciously omitted them as his winked-at implications would not have made sense by mentioning two historical cats-paws of world Jewry. In Spain, Jews squirm with anger when they speak of their expulsion after the Reconquista; a reaction to their central role as white slavers under the Moors. In Poland, the nation that had accepted a massive wave of Jewish emigres with open arms and unprecedented tolerance (illustrated by the Magdeburg Law), “mysteriously” turned against the largest Jewish population in Europe.
The zenith comes with Goldman’s use of the inflammatory “Holocaust” blood libel while bragging about the ability for a future racial Jewish state to field a larger army than the Germans only requires a little bit of reading between the lines. While most “Holocaust survivors” know that the gas chambers are at best, a folk legend, and at worse, a lie–the collective Jewish memory continues to despise Germans in accordance with Talmudic law. The German revolution forcefully removed Jews from the most important sectors of national life (finance, academia, media) and only years later united the world against the globalization they needed to retain their dominion. To Jews, this alone is enough to warrant their genocide, even though the original National Socialists are all dead and buried.
Imagine Europe in 2250, where only 20% of the population is European, and the rest of the country is an incoherent multicultural mess. The possibilities for Israel employing a Middle East-style “divide and conquer” strategy that fans contradictions that are racial, and thus more substantial, than what we see in the sectarianism of the Arab world today, are not far fetched. Amidst the chaos, a global Jewish population of hundreds of millions could once and for all emerge from the shadows and physically execute the threats they candidly fling in our direction with obscure and contradictory little footnotes to avoid alert. Except they won’t need to hide behind pseudo-science qualifiers like “white privilege”, nor the unsophisticated thuggery of the non-whites they incite against us.
This isn’t a paranoid “what if.” This is something Jews openly muse about, so just imagine what they talk about when they’re in private amongst themselves having drinks. I’m not quoting the Protocols of Zion, Daniel D. Perlmutter wrote about this in a hair-raising editorial for the Los Angeles Times:
“Israel has been building nuclear weapons for 30 years. The Jews understand what passive and powerless acceptance of doom has meant for them in the past, and they have ensured against it. Masada was not an example to follow—it hurt the Romans not a whit, but Samson in Gaza? What would serve the Jew-hating world better in repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a Nuclear Winter. Or invite all those tut-tutting European statesmen and peace activists to join us in the ovens? For the first time in history, a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away—unlike the Armenians, Tibetans, World War II European Jews, or Rwandans—have the power to destroy the world. The ultimate justice?”
The Jew Martin Van Creveld reiterated this sentiment, by promising the world nuclear holocaust if Israel were to be overthrown by the Second Intifada:
“We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: “Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.” I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”
Just imagine if these Jews had the means to back up their insolent mouths with tanks and an air force to fly over our grandchildren or great grandchildren in a future majority mulatto, balkanized Europe with no ability to retaliate. These aren’t random lunatics; these are influential Jewish intellectuals and policy makers making these remarks.
If you’re not politically active, it’s urgent you start now before it’s too late.