An Endorsement of Roosh’s ‘Neomasculinity’ Manifesto


Update 1/19/2016:

At the time of writing this review, it appeared that Roosh was moving in a less degenerate direction. We strive to give people the benefit of the doubt whenever possible. I’m perhaps too optimistic about people moving in a traditionalist direction, and I see it while it’s not there. While his Neomasculinity Manifesto itself appears promising, Roosh has taken to social media to brag about how he’s back to pick-up artistry, and is actively targeting White women with it with malicious anti-White intent.

Intellectual pretensions and posturing aside, Roosh remains a degenerate pick-up artist, remains anti-White, and has made his intentions so clear that even I, as eager as I was to ignore contrary evidence, have received the memo. I have been hopeful that Neomasculinity, the Manosphere, and Return of Kings were steadily moving in a direction which would offer young men (of all races) an approach to gender issues which empowered men without degrading women. I still believe that general goal is possible, though it evidently won’t be achieved by encouraging or supporting Roosh and his affiliated projects.

Roosh is a clever entrepreneur who has mastered the art of converting contemporary male angst and sexual frustration into sheckels with a flashy advertisement-laden click-bait website, Return of Kings. Much of what’s on the site is inflammatory and indefensible, and I’m not endorsing pick-up artistry or the denigration of women. In hindsight, though, even the offensive material kind of makes sense, as a man with a vision must necessarily construct himself a platform upon which to manifest his vision. Like it or not, Return of Kings is Roosh’s soapbox, and it’s a sturdy soapbox. He has a large audience, a solid pool of popular writers, and an ever-expanding monetization framework to help guarantee that he remains independent.

The first major surprise came a couple months ago with his well-researched article on The Damaging Effects Of Jewish Intellectualism And Activism On Western Culture. Were the man a petty huckster out to make a buck, he wouldn’t have been capable of assembling this impressive survey of the nature and scope of Jewish involvement in promoting degeneracy. Were the man a petty huckster out to make a buck, he certainly wouldn’t have published it front-and-center on his own website, under his own legal name. The second surprise managed to be even bigger. This entire time, the man’s been developing a masterful synthesis of human biodiversity knowledge, radical traditionalist principle, and pragmatic modern dating experience called “Neomasculinity” which seamlessly fuses these separate counter-currents into a systemic whole.

Neomasculinity combines traditional beliefs, masculinity, and animal biology into one ideological system. It aims to aid men living in Westernized nations that lack qualities such as classical virtue, masculinity in males, femininity in females, and objectivity, especially concerning beauty ideals and human behavior. It also serves as an antidote for males who are being programmed to accept Western degeneracy, mindless consumerism, and immoral state authority. The purpose of this article is to list and describe the principal doctrines of neomasculinity.

Contrary to what one might expect from a notorious pick-up artist, Roosh’s manifesto doesn’t promote or excuse sexual degeneracy. He offers us a practical path forward from it and back toward traditional monogamous pairings. Roosh’s manifesto doesn’t denigrate women. He makes the traditionalist argument for the sexes being of fundamentally equal value in complementary ways. Unlike Anglin, Roosh also accepts, without judgment or malice, that there always has been and always will be a degree of diversity in dispositions which entails that not all women can or should be housewives and that not all men can be especially masculine or strong. This is important, as a brittle and fundamentalist response to Modernity is vulnerable to critique and ripe for revolt.

  • While women don’t “belong” in the home, they do a better job than men at nesting and child raising.
  • Men and women should have some degree of free will to live a life compatible with their respective societies, but there should not be coordination between the media, government, and academia to program citizens to abandon their innate strengths for imagined ideas of utopia.
  • Patriarchy does have its flaws in locking in roles for males and females who are outliers[.]

That last part, about accounting for outliers, is key. While we must work toward reviving a patriarchal and traditionalist order, it’s also necessary to examine those systems to figure out how we can make them more durable next time around. The Jews and capitalists have done an excellent job of rounding up the misfits who were cast out of the old patriarchal Western order and turning them against us. We should strengthen ourselves against this tactic in the future by being less inclined to cast folks out of our communities for being outliers and eccentrics.

The only part in his Neomasculinity Manifesto that I strongly disagree with is his rejection of “socialism.” The disagreement here is largely due to his apparent lack of familiarity with clerical fascism, which organically accounts for the potential abuses, excesses, and externalities of secular socialism by tightly coupling communal altruism with coherent spiritual principles and direct social accountability. It’s much more difficult to “bleed the beast” when the “beast” is a charming local parish bustling with neighbors, friends, and family who love you and would be personally saddened to learn that you’ve decided to be a net drain on the community.

I’ve already directed a few young men I know to the manifesto, and I expect to continue doing so. Since I began my activism, I’ve constantly struggled to straddle being a believer in human biodiversity, being a radical traditionalist, and being a practical street activist. Day-by-day, inch-by-inch, these once-separate movements are gradually converging together into a general system of thought and behavior which seems destined to empower our young men and women with an inspiring and effective response to Modernity and its ongoing effort to destroy ourselves and our communities.


  • EricStriker

    People ought to learn the real definition of socialism before integrating Fox News talking points for short bus riders into their manifesto. Who would really rather live in starving capitalist 1930’s America over the average person in socialist Germany where factory workers would vacation at the Riviera?

    Hmmm, scraping by paycheck to paycheck and up to your neck in debt, or economic stability. Socialism wins, it’s just impossible to keep the hard fought concessions working people have won when millions of genetically irreconcilable people are flooded into your living space. The same is true for any system, but capitalists support open borders immigration in the hopes of provoking privatization when society is no longer able to be sustained.

    • tradyouth

      We have no firm way of knowing how Germany’s economic policies would have performed. We do have some clues, though. The Nordic countries quietly carried on with the socialist half of national socialism after the war, with relative success up until their failure to implement the nationalist half of national socialism doomed the socialism (as it invariably does, as you know). Within another decade, the influx of immigrants will ensure that Scandinavian socialism is completely dead and foxtard talking points will prevail presuming they don’t rediscover fascism.

      Secular fascism (national socialism) certainly works rather well compared to the existing alternatives, but a much tighter coupling between the hand that feeds and the hand that guides has the potential to perform even better and prove even more durable. Anecdotally, the early LDS church’s heavily spiritualized and clerical brand of socialism was an unqualified success for the brief time it had to thrive before bad theology and bad theory caught up with it.

  • Eric

    As much as classical liberals pretending to be nationalists or “conservatives” hate to think it, the white default has always been collectivism. Germany’s stable transition to the modern age under Bismarck was an impressive feat of state socialism, and a subject of much jealousy from Britain’s Jewish and Anglo elites. Britain’s industrialization was almost as messy and horrific as Stalins USSR, and that’s considering they were plundering half the world’s resources to bolster it. Another example is Mejii Japan, which initially sought to implement a British liberal model, but later found it unsustainable and opted for a socialist economy. The world’s first planned economy was the Japanese one, and it was a success by any standard, despite the massive limitations the country had regarding natural resources.

    On your second point, I don’t know if that’s comparable. The Mormons are apples, Germany was an orange. Clerical favoritism in Franco’s Spain did not protect a nationalist economy, the opposite, the Catholic church’s shift to team America during the Cold War led to Spain becoming intensely liberal capitalist-inevitably this caused their collapse. The more “secular” Falangists that Franco undermined, on the other hand, were socialists like Hitler and would’ve lasted much longer by not linking their national policy with the decisions of fickle and politically autonomous churches.

  • Bulan Sabriel

    Look’s like both you and the pusillanimous liars at Return of the Cowards delete all my comments.
    A smart right-wing Jew taking apart your lies and double standards is not permissible for those in league with the Marxists*.

    *See “On the Jewish Question” by Karl Marx to understand the beginning of your Marxism. Then see your third worldist and anti-colonialist Palestinianism.

    • Eric

      “Look’s like both you and the pusillanimous liars at Return of the Cowards delete all my comments.”

      You mean like outlets that Jews like you have in your pocket, like American Renaissance, do? To my knowledge, nobody here censors you. You are allowed to say your piece, but instead you tell lies about how the evil communist Islamo-Nazis are censoring you, in true Hasbarat form. Your arguments are incredibly weak, your Jew rationalization regarding the article about the Kosher FRAUD tax was basically what the whole article spent debunking (that people specifically want to buy kosher food, despite indications being virtually hidden from the unassuming).

      “A smart right-wing Jew taking apart your lies and double standards is not permissible for those in league with the Marxists*.”

      “Smart right-wing Jews” are as bad or worse than the Leftist ones. 4,000 Americans died in Iraq thanks to “smart right-wing Jews”, do you have an ANSWER FOR THAT? And on top of that, “smart right-wing” Jews like you want a repeat of far greater gravity in Iran for no good reason. “Smart right-wing Jews” invented neo-conservatism, which is just “right-wing” Judeo-bolshevism.

      “*See “On the Jewish Question” by Karl Marx to understand the beginning of your Marxism. Then see your third worldist and anti-colonialist Palestinianism.”

      A safe and stable third world is good for whites. Leftists might support the same thing for different reasons, so what? Leftists are right about a lot of things, they protested the war in Iraq, oppose the US government spying on citizens to give the information to Israel, and oppose the Jewish parasites destroying the world on Wall Street. Their causes are often just, their methods and ideology is what’s wrong. And that too is thanks to their “white privilege” teaching Jew professors keeping them in the dark about reality.

    • tradyouth

      Then see your third worldist and anti-colonialist Palestinianism.

      What is “third worldism”? I’ll tell you what he’s implying by third worldism. He’s accusing moi of having more camaraderie with third world street trash than with intelligent and sophisticated Jewish Americans.

      I couldn’t agree more. He’s correct.

      I would step over Bulan Sabriel while he’s choking to hug a black gangster.

      I would offer an illegal immigrant landscaper a $20 tip to weed whack his garden if Bulan Sabriel were my neighbor.

      I would shout “Allahu Akbar!” alongside an Islamic jihadist throwing rocks at an IDF tank rolling through a Palestinian village.

      I have no special affinity for the third world and believe the best solutions to third world problems would and should come from the third world itself, without my advice or assistance. There are certainly some points of conflict and tension between my interests and third world interests, and I’m a firm advocate for my people.

      But Organized Jewry, which Bulan Sabriel unfailingly defends and supports, exacerbates those conflicts. The black gangster behaves as he does in large part due to goading from the Jewish-controlled entertainment industry. The illegal immigrant is invited here, allowed here, and employed here disproportionately by Organized Jewry. The wars and conflicts we’re in with the third world right now are pretty much a the behest of Organized Jewry.

      The Jew cries out as he strikes you, and Bulan surely considers it a grave injustice and moral tragedy that I dared to state the empirically verifiable obvious: that Jews dominate the gangsta rap industry, that Jews aggressively push for illegal immigration, and that Jews pretty much control our foreign policy.

      I’m no “third worldist,” by any stretch of the imagination. But I consider it a high compliment to be called one by Bulan Sabriel.

  • Eric

    Yeah, bubu’s a manipulative little rat. He uses all the “key words” that would evoke defensive posture and confusion in your standard conservative idiot who thinks he’s a white nationalist. He’s got to learn however, that it doesn’t work on people with a brain, or those who actually pay attention.

    If you complain about Jewish socio-political behavior being repulsive and dangerous (whether “right” or “left”), then you’re Karl Marx. If you see common cause with our funding of the overt genocide and slow cultural destruction of Palestinians and the slow genocide and fast cultural destruction of Europe, you’re a “third worldist”. And any issue you may have in common with the left on the surface, but with totally different ideological underpinnings, makes you a communist regardless.

    Hardcore “Liberal” Jews like Bill Maher, Chuck Schumer, and Abe Foxman support Talmudic Nazism in Israel, how come Bulan agrees with them? Does that make him a “liberal” then?

  • Pingback: National Policy Institute 2015 | Aryan Skynet()

  • Pingback: Praise of Folly Podcast Episode #1: AltRight « Attack the System()

Roosh

By: Matt Parrott


Matt is a founding member of TradYouth and is currently the project's Chief Information Officer. He's been active in the White Identity cause for years, primarily as a blogger but also as a street activist and regional organizer.
%d bloggers like this: