Labor and Tradition: Dump the Bosses Off Your Back


Rights Must be Fought ForThe working class has been fighting for a living wage and bearable working conditions for centuries. While Europe prior to the advance of capitalism had believed in the importance of the elites having a “nobles obligation” to the lower classes to provide for them a survivable wage, infrastructure, and other needs, the modern class war is one of “every man for himself.”

The true definition of society is one of an extended family. The father is the spiritual and moral head of the household, called to guide and steer his family through the tumultuous ups and downs of life while providing for them. Following that template, a natural and organic aristocracy exists to unite the folk as one and to ensure the health and long-term survival of a nation. The redefining of a nation from a folk and community to that of a “social contract” business arrangement creates a tyranny of the rich over the working class.

A society cannot survive as the Communists would have it, with the working class overthrowing the elites. A society also cannot survive when the elites betray their God-given mission to be proper stewards. A nation will survive and thrive when the elites and the blue collar can unite, hand-in-hand, and work together to build a better nation for all walks of life.

America is a ultimate expression of the decline of the unity between the elites and working class. In a revolution that dismantled centuries of monarchy and the Church ruling over the society, Freemasons and capitalists were able to Shanghai millions of colonists into embracing the identity of America. The American identity is one not forged in blood, history, race, or theology, but one based on the worship of the Almighty Dollar. Like the Israelites of ancient times who worshiped the Golden Calf, the American elites have bought into the worship of self.

The working class in America has always struggled under the weight of taxes and regulation which make moving up socially and economically very difficult. The control of “old money” over the affairs both social and economic of State’s and the nation ensure that democracy and equal protection under the law are little more than words tossed out to placate the masses.

While a poor man who steals fifty dollars from a liquor store might get ten years in prison, banksters who loot billions from hardworking pensioners will get house arrest in his sprawling mansion. While White working class individuals are forced to send their kids to integrated schools that push cultural Marxism and are increasingly dangerous due to large numbers of Third World gangs, the elites can send their children to elite academies.

Working men and women cannot organize to achieve safe working conditions and livable wages without hired thugs and government agents harassing them and busting in their skulls while the rich are given bailouts and immunity from prosecution for their countless crimes against humanity. The economic and social System in America has never been equal before the law, because it was never intended to be.

While the degeneracy of America’s elites are numerous and attacks on the humanity of the White population are seemingly without end, the labor situation in the 20th century is the epitome of the battle between Tradition and Modernity. In Logan County, West Virginia, the battle lines were drawn and the people of West Virginia and America at large had to decide, which side are you on?

The work towards living wages and safety standards for the working class in the 19th and 20th century were not polite political struggles, they were outright wars. The labor struggle was led by various factions of working organizations such as the more radical I.W.W (the Wobblies), the United Mine Workers, the American Federation of Labor, and other smaller factions ranging from Communist organizations to labor organizations with fascist undertones. The American labor movement was far from a united front, a fact that the bosses and government took advantage of.

Just as the modern White Nationalist and Traditionalist movement struggles with infighting, the American labor movement had too many personalities, egos, and vested interests in not coalescing together. The battle between “radicals” on both sides of the ideological perspective, both of whom disliked the centrist labor leaders, left a movement in which personal attacks, backroom deals, and division became rife.

Most modern Americans when they hear “organized labor” think of a Left Wing phenomenon. Much like the modern Irish Republican movement, organized labor has been hijacked by Communists. That is not how the movement started out. Organizations such as the Knights of Labor that was a majority Traditional Catholic organization and other Right Wing labor groups were some of the most dedicated and ferocious defenders of workers’ rights.

Communists, anarchists, and other Socialist organizations were even “White Supremacist” by modern standards, by supporting immigration controls and advocating almost entirely for White workers. Almost without exception, until the latter half of the 20th century, organized labor and unions were endeavors with a wide spectrum of beliefs, but were almost exclusively a White affair. Racial Egalitarianism was not then and never has been supported by the steelworkers, coal miners, and legions of hard working White Americans who were part of the labor struggle.

The “moderate” wing of the American labor movement, much like the conservatives of the modern era, were far more interested in the respect of the System and financial benefits, than actually helping the workers. The American Federation of Labor under international Jew Samuel Gompers continually betrayed the men and women who were literally having their skulls cracked by company thugs and police officers.

It should strike a familiar chord with modern Traditionalists where Jewish money and Jewish leadership works to create a false opposition. The System gives respect to that organization, but the values they are supposed to hold to are never met. Contemporary kosher conservatives who betray Christian values at the behest of their Jewish masters are simply the next incarnation of a political movement for the best interests of White Americans. The moderate labor organizers who positioned themselves as the “rational” and “reasonable” alternatives to the “radicals” were the first ones to buddy up with the bosses, media, and government. This insiders’ club essentially meant that the working class and union organizers were on their own.

The issue of factions breaking ranks is a classic problem in political movements. In the modern White nationalist movement, fights over uniforms, symbolism, cosmetic differences, and egos leads to more damage to the Cause than the Left could ever do. Too often, White advocates are happy to throw their own folk under the bus, and the labor movement of the 20th century was no different. When the hardcore unions and labor organizations held strikes that became unpopular with the government and media, many of the mainstream labor organizations betrayed their comrades in the struggle.

This would come back to haunt the mainstream organizations because years later when the bosses and government worked to reneg on their previous deals, and the labor movement was unable to come together. When unity and trust are broken, it is very hard to put Humpty Dumpty back together again. Breaking ranks doesn’t work in battle or politics, a lesson that contemporary culture warriors should remember.

The buildup to uprising was one built upon years of suffering, work, and the blood of martyrs. When I first began researching the treatment of mine workers in the 20th century, I found the first chink in my belief in capitalism being a positive economic System. The conditions of miners and factory workers in the recent history of the Western world should be horrendous enough to make every man, woman, and child either a communist or a fascist, because the “free market” taken to its logical extreme is the embodiment of greed and evil.

At the end of the day, the battle of organized labor should resonate with the average man and woman in America, even if they are not toiling away in a mine or factory. How is receiving a paycheck of fiat Federal Reserve notes any different than receiving company scrip? Although companies like Wal-Mart have only recently been forced to stop issuing scrip in nations outside of the United States, the practice has largely moved from the private sector to the Federal Reserve. Company scrip, or paper “money” printed by a company for their workers to use at company stores at least is a currency backed by a corporation that produces, the Federal Reserve is backed only by insidious greed and public ignorance. The Federal Reserve monopoly on the American worker is nearly complete, with the exception of those turning to bullion, Bitcoin, and other alternative currencies.

The System’s persecution of the workers of the modern era is even more wicked than the thuggery of the Baldwin-Felts gunmen. Workers are no longer having their skulls cracked by baton-wielding company guards, they are having it done by the supposed upholders of law and virtue. Companies and the elites no longer need to outsource to private companies (although I am sure that Blackwater would love the job), the police are simply the tools of the elites.

Cops with mace, drones, and “no knock” warrants enforce the whims of the business owners who have long ago bought and sold the politicians in Washington, DC and the Statehouses across this nation. In the early 20th century, the company goons would be “deputized” by the local sheriff and be given full legal protections to be armed enforcers for the company. Local law enforcement willingly pawned off its power in order to get bribes and new equipment from those willing to pay. Just as Sheriff Chafin of Logan County West Virginia was able to amass a personal fortune and seemingly endless power through corrupting the position he had been elected to do by the people of West Virginia, so do many of our modern law enforcement agents betray their cause to protect and serve the citizens of their state or county. The dignity of the American worker when they attempt to organize, strike, or make real political change is crushed by the forces of the System and misdirected by controlled opposition.

The modern workers unions are been entirely hijacked by the System. Hordes of Third World immigrants and their families will not help American workers, it will drive down their wages and cripple the American economy into a pathetic banana republic. When workers wish to strike, most unions do not even pay the lost wages of their workers as they used to in previous, and more dedicated generations. The American unions of the modern era are lapdogs for the globalists, “Workers of the World Unite Under the New World Order” is the new battle cry instead of unions working to improve the pay and conditions for the working class. Homosexuality, infanticide, and pats on the back to other Leftist causes have taken the place of advocating for the worker, a tragic reflection of the corruption of supposed leaders.

The fundamental problem facing the White working class is the same one that faced the miners at the Battle of Blair Mountain, belief in the System. The men of West Virginia had suffered under company thugs, low wages, harassment, and even the murder of sympathetic lawmen like Sid Hatfield did not push the men to throw off their shackles, but the murder of women at Sharples WV thrust the men into action. In 1921 over ten thousand miners picked up their hunting rifles and marched on the town of Mingo to free arrested miners and take the fight to the bosses.

The miners fought with company scabs, police, and private detectives with thousands of rounds being exchanged. The company used airplanes ( a first in American history) to drop homemade explosives on the miners and their wives while gunning down countless blue collar workers with machine guns and military grade equipment. The fears of modern Americans when the local police are given armored vehicles, automatic weapons, and drones is not unfounded, we have examples in American history where the law shows it will do anything to smash those who question the orthodoxy of the State.

The miners had fought a hard fight for three days around Blair Mountain and it looked as if they would soon crack the police and company line, then President Harding sent in the army. To a man, the union refused to fire on Federal troops who in every strike previously, and in this circumstance, took the side of big business. The union workers believed in America, believed in the American dream, and believed in their government, and that is why they were doomed from the start.

The battle of Blair Mountain proves that if you truly want change you cannot expect the System to give it to you on a silver platter. White workers cannot get a fair shake from the bosses or the politicians, they are all in bed together. One look at Bilderburg, the Council on Foreign Relations, or the Trilateral Commission shows that business and politicians go hand in hand. This System is corrupt and we cannot hope to be able to raise up our people and our families in a positive and Godly way when we are under the bootheel of the elites.

We must demand and seize the dignity of a living wage and the future of a new nation here on the North American continent, for our people, and by our people. Compromise with the System will only leave you in hovels surrounded by Third World invaders as the politicians and business elites sit in mansions upon a hill. It is not time to beg scraps off of their table, it is to toss over the table and remove our support from their rigged economic System and their perverted Judeo/Masonic “nation” and create a Home just for us.

White workers of the world unite, and dump the bosses off your back.


  • Matt,

    “The working class has been fighting for a living wage and bearable working conditions for centuries. While Europe prior to the advance of capitalism had believed in the importance of the elites having a “nobles obligation” to the lower classes to provide for them a survivable wage, infrastructure, and other needs, the modern class war is one of “every man for himself.”

    >>>Yet the Feudal Noble-Serf Dialectic is exactly what Europe rejected in the rise of Communism. The Communist Manifesto states,

    “The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.”

    http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#007

    “The redefining of a nation from a folk and community to that of a “social contract” business arrangement creates a tyranny of the rich over the working class.”

    >>>And an open door to racial integration.

    “A society cannot survive as the Communists would have it, with the working class overthrowing the elites. A society also cannot survive when the elites betray their God-given mission to be proper stewards. A nation will survive and thrive when the elites and the blue collar can unite, hand-in-hand, and work together to build a better nation for all walks of life.”

    >>>Agreed which is why your Feudal construction will not work. The Feudal society was a calculated rejection of the Bible.

    “Bishop Adalbero of Laon: The Tripartite Society…For human law distinguishes two classes. Nobles and serfs, indeed, are not governed by the same ordinance…The other class is that of the serfs. This luckless breed possesses nothing except at the cost of its own labour…[Footnote: Jacques Le Goff, Medieval Civilization, trans. Julia Barrow (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990), 255]” (pg. 221)

    This is a deliberate and calculated rejection of the Bible: Num. 15:15-29

    “America is a ultimate expression of the decline of the unity between the elites and working class. In a revolution that dismantled centuries of monarchy and the Church ruling over the society, Freemasons and capitalists were able to Shanghai millions of colonists into embracing the identity of America. The American identity is one not forged in blood, history, race, or theology, but one based on the worship of the Almighty Dollar.”

    >>>Agreed

    “The working class in America has always struggled under the weight of taxes and regulation which make moving up socially and economically very difficult. The control of “old money” over the affairs both social and economic of State’s and the nation ensure that democracy and equal protection under the law are little more than words tossed out to placate the masses.”

    >>>I am going to need to see some statistics on that in order to believe it. Before the Yankee invasion, the South was a Utopia for a Freeman and a Yeoman farmer. Even after the 14th Amendment we still had In esse and sui juris status-right to our wages for labor.

    “While a poor man who steals fifty dollars from a liquor store might get ten years in prison, banksters who loot billions from hardworking pensioners will get house arrest in his sprawling mansion.”

    >>>This is a result of Christian Theology. Christianity did away with the Torah and thus its usury laws. The Catholic Church’s feigned half obedience to this command before the rise of mercantilism and into the Renaissance period and its subsequent ultimate compromise with usury shows just how spineless and illogical Christian Theology is. Not to mention the jubilee laws.

    “The work towards living wages and safety standards for the working class in the 19th and 20th century were not polite political struggles, they were outright wars. The labor struggle was led by various factions of working organizations such as the more radical I.W.W (the Wobblies), the United Mine Workers, the American Federation of Labor, and other smaller factions ranging from Communist organizations to labor organizations with fascist undertones. The American labor movement was far from a united front, a fact that the bosses and government took advantage of.”

    >>>Too much industrialization. The farm life avoids most of this. The Industrial city life is a den of thieves and corruption. Domestic production should be focused on instead of factory production. The Cultural Marxists don’t like the sound of this because they know it unites the family too much and takes the children away from their Marxist training centers.

    “Just as the modern White Nationalist and Traditionalist movement struggles with infighting”

    >>>Isn’t it obvious that Christianity cannot produce a unified system of philosophy yet? We have tens of thousands of religious factions here and growing daily.

    “Communists, anarchists, and other Socialist organizations were even “White Supremacist” by modern standards, by supporting immigration controls and advocating almost entirely for White workers. Almost without exception, until the latter half of the 20th century, organized labor and unions were endeavors with a wide spectrum of beliefs, but were almost exclusively a White affair.”

    >>>I cannot distinguish a single principle you hold from Nazism Matt. I fear for your soul. You tell people you are a traditional southerner. Nazism has nothing whatsoever to do with the South. NOTHING!!!!!!!!!

    “The “moderate” wing of the American labor movement, much like the conservatives of the modern era, were far more interested in the respect of the System and financial benefits, than actually helping the workers. The American Federation of Labor under international Jew Samuel Gompers continually betrayed the men and women who were literally having their skulls cracked by company thugs and police officers.”

    >>>Then go out to the country and build a farm. Why do we have to maintain the Capitalist-Communist Dialectic? The Industrial Revolution is done here anyway. We cannot compete with China Industrially with the labor laws we have here.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0VjwU8cWEw

    “It should strike a familiar chord with modern Traditionalists where Jewish money and Jewish leadership works to create a false opposition. The System gives respect to that organization, but the values they are supposed to hold to are never met. Contemporary kosher conservatives who betray Christian values at the behest of their Jewish masters are simply the next incarnation of a political movement for the best interests of White Americans.”

    >>>What organization? The men I see getting rich are the Knights of Malta and the Chinese. The men who dominate the banks in America are Knights of Malta. The men who run the European Union are Catholics.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Manuel_Barroso

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Van_Rompuy

    The Rothschild family is well known to be the Vatican Bankers. The people who dominate industry are Chinese. So please help me to see what you are seeing. Do you have anything which lists all the Jews who control the world who are not beholden to the Pope?

    “either a communist or a fascist, because the “free market” taken to its logical extreme is the embodiment of greed and evil.”

    >>>Preach!

    “(although I am sure that Blackwater would love the job)”

    >>>Oh, those Catholic Knights of Malta; those crusading murderers!

    “instead of unions working to improve the pay and conditions for the working class.”

    >>>That is never going to work. Go to the country and build a farm.

    1.When the Union strikes against his employer, the employer’s costs go up, and thus prices go up and his leisure activities go down. But wait! Those leisure activities are provided by common hireling workers. Thus, in their desire to fight for the common hireling worker, the Union persecutes common hireling workers.

    2. Unless a Union is willing to resort to violence, other workers are sought by the employer to fulfill the positions the striking Union refuse to take, leaving the family of this striking Union helpless and out in the cold.

    3. If the Union is willing to resort to violence they, in their hypocritical desire to fight for the rights of labor refuse the rights of labor for those they call scabs.

    4. This denial of others the right to work creates an aristocracy of rights, a monopoly of labor, among the Union. They become just like the people they say they hate. HYPOCRITES!

    5. The backfire of Unions is if other labor forces such as agriculture could unite to strike, they could drive up the costs of food and thus negate the success the Factory Union had with their employers by raising their wages. The new wage is wasted on more expensive food.

    6. But agricultural laborers do not have the ability to create a union, and thus the factory Unionists have a monopoly on the right to Unionize and Strike.

    7. These Union strikes then do not affect the employers nearly as much as their fellow citizen. When a Union strikes, the demands force the Employer’s costs up, which forces him to raise costs on his products. This then raises the price of goods on the Union’s fellow common laborers outside the factory.

    8. When a Union is formed it must have the authority to command its members to abstain from work and furnish subsistence to their members during a strike. What else is this subordination and dependence but slavery?

    9. If the Communist appeals to the idea of Nationalizing the employers and making the Government the employer, the inevitable result will be a representative of Government compelling everyone to perform their share of labor. What else is this but slavery?

    “We must demand and seize the dignity of a living wage and the future of a new nation here on the North American continent, for our people, and by our people. Compromise with the System will only leave you in hovels surrounded by Third World invaders as the politicians and business elites sit in mansions upon a hill. It is not time to beg scraps off of their table, it is to toss over the table and remove our support from their rigged economic System and their perverted Judeo/Masonic “nation” and create a Home just for us.”

    >>>Judeo Masonic? You do know that the Bible was written by Jews right? You do know that the Mesiah was a Jew right? You do know that Masonry is Catholic? It is based on Catholic orders and was created by Jesuits to regain the Stuart Throne in England right?

    What better way to overthrow this system than to move out to the country and start a farm instead of this constant, never ending fawning after the Industrial Towers of Babel?

    • Not sure why the name Tom was filled in. My name is not Tom. My name is Drake.

    • Leslie H. Higgins

      You are delusional to think the Church has that much power. Van Rompuy and his ilk are cultural Catholics, but do not live it out in their political careers; Freemasonry is one of the Church’s longstanding foes, and Masons attempt to marginalize the place of religion in society wherever they go.

      Also, note that there is a distinction between Judaism prior to the Resurrection and modern Talmudic Judaism.

  • Pingback: Reply to Matthew Heimbach’s “Labor and Tradition: Dump the Bosses Off Your Back” «Uncreated Light Uncreated Light()

  • KO

    This discussion seems confined by the left-right dichotomy of capital vs. labor. I imagine Mr. Buhls and Mr. Heimbach both know something about the Distributist alternative. That is the way out of the capital/labor conflict. “Capitalism” to Hilaire Belloc means excessive concentration of ownership, not simply private ownership of the means of production. In a Distributist society, the means of production are widely distributed — what our contemporaries like to call the ownership society, but realized to such an extent that families that own their means of production are the dominant majority of the population. The workingman is thus an owner supporting a family and paying employees who are on a path to become owners, though there will always be those unfit to be owners. Belloc thought the guild system was the path not taken by industrial society. Instead of armies of employees working at fewer factories, there should be armies of owners, with production possibly more widely distributed as well. To Americans, this might suggest that Jeffersonian-Jacksonian ideas should have propelled the “county” to take over the “city,” rather than having Hamiltonian ideas transform the “country” into a network of factories based on the model of the “city.”

    In a “Capitalist” society, labor unions have the potential to be parasites dependent on the power of concentrated ownership to be able to direct benefits to their members and siphon off wealth and status for themselves. They are dependent on workers remaining non-owners. (Hence the drive to import millions of new peons.)

    TYN may want to explore Distributism as one of the avenues out of our current degradation. To some extent Distributism may turn out to be revolutionary, if workers seize and hold the means of production, rather than handing them over to local or national bureaucrats, as the Nazis and Communists advocate, and as the Democrats and Republicans willy-nilly have brought about. (“Ownership” of the means of production is really a question of control, not title. The left has succeeded in socializing huge amounts of the economy by regulation, always pretending, dishonestly, that leaving title in private hands means their system isn’t socialism. That’s the bad faith in their scorn for those who call Obama a socialist.) (Big business goes along with this and funds it in return for protection from competition.) If the dollar and the stock markets collapse, the path should be towards wider ownership, not tighter bureaucratic control. In addition to preparing traditionalist youth to managing government (in whatever form that takes), TYN should think about preparing them to manage production.

    Thanks for your work here.

  • Dustin

    Matthew, I don’t like how you lionize the lower classes. This whole idea that they are some “moral majority” that is simply mislead by “liberal elites” has been thoroughly debunked by Charles Murray’s work on the subject, which debunks it with hard statistics, and which is among so many other works debunking this notion.

    Have you forgotten that it is their votes which in election after election have provided support for this entire social experiment which we find ourselves living in to not only continue, but to grow even more radical, year after year?

  • Leslie H. Higgins

    “You are delusional to think the Church has that much power.”

    >>>I am delusional to cite facts? Here I’ll cite some more:

    The most influential University in America is Georgetown University, a Jesuit Catholic University. Most of the talking heads on the media and the ruling Politicians are trained at Jesuit Universities. Notice they never come from Hebrew University.As a matter of fact can you name me any influential Universities in America?

    Lets just look at the political structure over me here in Louisville, Ky.

    Kentucky, legislature

    Daniel Mongiardo Lt. Governor- Roman Catholic
    Jerry Abramson- Lt. Governor- Jew trained by Jesuits at Georgetown University
    Alison Lundergan Grimes- Secretary of State of Kentucky-Roman Catholic Lexington Catholic High School which is partner to the Jesuit Spiritual Center at Milford in Ohio.
    Jack Conway: Attorney general- Roman Catholic, Jesuit trained at St. Xavier High School
    John Yarmuth, our U.S. Representative for Kentucky’s 3rd congressional district was trained at Jesuit Georgetown University.
    Mayor Gregory E. Fischer was brought up in Trinity Catholic High School and in 2006, Fischer received the Catholic Schools Distinguished Alumni Award from the Archdiocese of Louisville.
    Chief Justice John Roberts- Roman Catholic
    Vice President Joe Biden- Roman catholic, Numerous Jesuit Degrees
    Speaker of the House of Representatives (John Boehner) Roman Catholic- Graduate of Jesuit Xavier University

    Behold the horrifying facts Leslie. FACTS ARE FACTS WHETHER YOU ACKNOWLEDGE TO BE OR NOT!

    “Van Rompuy and his ilk are cultural Catholics, but do not live it out in their political careers;”

    >>>Doing some more fact denying Leslie? A bit of White Holocaust denial hmmmm?

    “Freemasonry is one of the Church’s longstanding foes”

    >>>Wrong. Masonry was created by the Jesuits to infiltrate Protestant Countries and brinmg them under the power of Jesuit cooperative Popes:

    Albert Mackey says in his Encyclopedia of Freemasonry and its Kindred
    Sciences (McClure Publishing Co.: Philadelphia, 1917), page 134-135,

    “Bode, Johann Joachim Christoph.
    Born in Brunswick, 18th of January, 1730. One of the most distinguished Masons of his time. . . . in 1757 he established himself at Hamburg as a bookseller, and was initiated into the Masonic Order.. . . To Masonic literature he made many valuable contributions; among others, he translated from the French Bonneville’s celebrated work entitled Les Jesuites chasses de la Maconnerie et leur poignard brise par les Macons, which contains a comparison of Scottish Masonry with the Templarism of the fourteenth century. In 1790 he joined the order of the Illuminati, obtaining the highest degree in its second class, and at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad he advocated the opinions of Weishaupt. No man of his day was better versed than he in the history of Freemasonry, or possessed a more valuable and extensive library; no one was more diligent in increasing his stock of Masonic knowledge, or more anxious to avail himself of the rarest sources of learning. Hence, he has always held an exhalted position among the Masonic scholars of Germany. The theory which he had conceived on the origin of Freemasonry—a theory however, which the investigations of subsequent historians have proved to be untenable [Consider the source-DS]-was that the Order was invented by the Jesuits, in the seventeenth century, as an instrument for the re-establishment of the Roman Church in England, covering it for their own purposes under the mantle of Templarism.”

    Edmond Ronayne says in his, The Master’s Carpet; Or Masonry and Baal-Worship Identical pages 142-143,

    “Hence, according to Pope Leo XII, after whom the present Pope is named, the very Bible which is insulted on the Masonic altar contains not the revelation of God, but simply the ‘gospel of the devil,’ while Freemasonry steps boldly to the front exclaiming: ‘Quite correct, Most Holy Father! Quite correct! My Square and Compass are every way equal to, if not superior to the Authorized Version of the Bible, and will ‘enlighten’ mankind quite as well. Go on, my dear sir! Go on, Bro. Leo, and issue your Bulls and Encyclicals against the Bible with all the rancor of which your old heart is capable, and I’ll keep right on in my peculiarly aggressive course, degrading and debasing God’s Word below my pagan emblems, and teaching my people that it is no better than the Koran, the Shasters or the Book of Mormon. Go on, Mr. Pope! Make all the Roman Catholics you can, and I’ll guarantee to manufacture quite as many infidels from among the Protestants, and between us, I think, we shall be able to neutralize the great work of the Reformation, and perhaps destroy Christianity altogether.’ ”

    Behold the facts, documented facts in all their horror Leslie. The real conspiracy is not jewish bolshevikism, it is Jesuit, Counter-Reformation.

    “Also, note that there is a distinction between Judaism prior to the Resurrection and modern Talmudic Judaism.”

    >>>And that distinction is what? There were numerous Talmudic elements alive and well in Messiah’s time. The Common-Unclean distinction that Rav Shaul speaks to in Rom 14 and Peter in Acts 10. Mat 5 made mention of numerous Talmudic traditions.

    • That was supposed to read any influential Jewish Universities.

Rights Must be Fought For

By: Matthew Heimbach



%d bloggers like this: