As some of you may recall from my last series of articles, I tend to put quite an emphasis on the importance of culture when talking about identity or political issues. I often hesitate to call myself a “White Nationalist,” as I feel uncomfortable using white; a biological racial classification, and the idea of nationhood; a unique group with its own history and culture, as if they were one and the same thing.
While homogeneous race is a key component of nationhood, shared race does not imply a shared nation; Englishmen are not Russians and Greeks are not Spaniards, for example. While all the aforementioned nations are white, being white does not make them the same people. One reason I am so adamant about that fact, rather than any desire to be divisive, is because I DO want to preserve Western cultures (plural), and to clump us all together based only on a simple biological concept like “white” devalues individual cultures practiced by white people and is another step toward globalization.
All of history reads like a great drama; all the wars, migrations, the rise and fall of civilizations, and all of these connecting and leading to the next stage. The children’s poem For Want of a Nail springs to mind. I cannot help but see a pattern in history, and feel a strong sense of some kind of higher consciousness, some divine architect moving things along according to a grand scheme. I also believe that, collectively, Aryans/Indo-Europeans are at the peak of humanity. In terms of combined creativity, intelligence, and physical strength this seems to be instrumental in moving this divine plan toward fruition. While other races may excel further at one of the three, no other is so well-rounded.
It seems, almost like a natural phenomenon, that in any mixed race society the most Caucasian-related members of society rise to the top like cream, or like oil and water. A fascinating read for anyone interested is Arthur Kemp’s March of the Titans. While not perfect, it does a very good job in showing the racial differences in various societies, and how in all of them, the whitest segments of the population have been the prime movers in that culture’s development.
The main purpose here is to put a positive spin on much of the gloom and doom broadcasted by many racialists as to the prospects of future America.
For the most part, it seems many American racialists believe that the waves of Mestizo immigrants, combined with blacks, given the advantages of the federal government, will swarm every nook and cranny of this fine land and turn it into a big coffee stain on the map. Indeed this may very well end up being the case, unless we prepare for what might happen.
It is my belief that we can prepare for these events by studying other societies that have faced similar conditions.
Mexico, and Central/South America in general, are very good examples of the phenomenon. According to March of the Titans, rather than push the natives out and populate their American colonies with their own citizens, as had England and France, the Spaniards and Portuguese only sent a limited number of their people to manage the resources of the New World, utilizing the vast pools of native labor, still in shock and awe of the superior technology of the Europeans. It was quite reminiscent of the Aryan conquest of India.
To digress for a moment, India is another good example. Even today the higher castes of Indian society on average boast lighter eyes and skin than the lowly sudra, dalit, and chandala. The actors and actresses of Bollywood are more often than not selected only if they belong to the Brahmin or Kshatriya castes. As is often the case when an aristocracy comes from one culture conquering another, the high and middle caste Indians don’t see themselves even being the countrymen of the Indian masses– as opposed to classes rising organically from amongst their own countrymen, like the Polish Szlachta, whose ranks were relatively open to self-made men. Often, depending on the region, members of the priest and higher-warrior castes were quite cooperative with the British authorities, something that impressed the Europeans and caused them to research the racial-social history of the subcontinent. Adolf Hitler once remarked how impressed he was by how a few thousand Englishmen came to dominate a vast area of land populated by millions upon millions of Hindoos.
Back to the point though…
One might object that the Spanish in Mexico, the Portuguese in Brazil, and the British in India had the advantage of being the conquerors of these majority non-white lands far from home, in that their actual homelands were free of other races. The colonies were being settled by excess population, so that if they disappeared the original Spanish or English cultures at home would still be intact. In modern America the whites are the natives, as in the natives of America the nation-state, and we are the ones being displaced by the lower segments of the population. All valid statements, but we can see this as an advantage.
The fact is that we have time to prepare.